Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

WILL SCIENCE DISPROVE GOD? [Spirituality & Religion]

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXey0X0CxjU]

You know where I stand on this question.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
PatKirby · M
Since you yourself cannot, nor ever have, proven or deduced the existence of your God, I shall show you an example procedure (within a scientific framework) in which to do so.

First, we postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into Hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today.

Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, then you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in Hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant. Therefore two options exist:

1) If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until [i][b]All Hell Breaks Loose. [/b][/i]

2) If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until [i][b]Hell Freezes Over. [/b][/i]

So which is it?

If we accept the quote given by many Liberals and celebrities that "it will be a cold night in Hell before Donald Trump is elected President" and take into account the fact that he indeed was elected President, then Option 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is endothermic and has [i][b]already frozen over.[/b][/i]

Therefore, the corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is in fact extinct...leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being. Which explains why the day after the 2016 Presidential election, Liberals and celebrities kept shouting "Oh my God."

So this just goes to show that although I'm not an atheist, I was able to at least provide [i]something.[/i] You have never come up with [i]anything.[/i] So you must either not be trying very hard, don't care or you're just here to sound off a hypocritical manifesto diatribe and expect common sense, thinking people to just believe your verbal diarrhea out of hand. Betting on the latter.

[center]
[/center]
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@PatKirby Good to see this again.
Adstar · 56-60, M
@PatKirby [quote]First, we postulate that if souls exist, [b]then they must have some mass[/b].[/quote]

Right at the foundation we see a fault.. There is no basis for the need to believe a soul has mass.. Everything built on a faulty foundation is bound to be wonky and so it is..
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@Adstar There's no basis to believe a soul even exists.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Entwistle [quote]There's no basis to believe a soul even exists.[/quote]

There sure is basis to believe a soul lives.
PatKirby · M
@Adstar
Right at the foundation we see your cherry-picking fault. You're missing the forest for inspecting each tree thus missing the spirit of the story. This is only a humorous example. Try harder, you can do it.
PatKirby · M
@Entwistle
Correct. 'If' is clearly stated but I suppose that's beyond some people.
PatKirby · M
@Bushranger
Thank you. Credit goes to Trump.