WILL SCIENCE DISPROVE GOD? [Spirituality & Religion]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXey0X0CxjU]
You know where I stand on this question.
You know where I stand on this question.
61-69, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
Will science disprove god? Well...no, it won't. Science functions through the scientific method, and the scientific method requires observation. In order to conduct science, you need to be able to collect data on whatever it is you're studying. And the whole point of god is that he's unable to be observed in any way. He is invisible, inaudible, incorporeal, undetectable by all means, he is not made of matter or energy, he does not influence or affect anything made of matter or energy...god doesn't exist in any physical capacity in our universe. So how can science disprove - or prove for that matter - the existence of something that we have absolutely no way of interacting with?
1-25 of 26
Carazaa · F
@BlueMetalChick God makes himself known to select few.
Carazaa · F
@BlueMetalChick Sorry for bothering you!
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@Sharon Indeed. And that's the point. You can believe in whatever you wish to. And in all honesty, I feel that it's somewhat a mark of a healthy mind to at least think about the existence of god. We as humans naturally assume agency in the world, and for good reason. But to try to prove god with science is just bloody stupid.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@BlueMetalChick depends also really in your definition of God. Not all religions define God as an anthropomorphic being. God by Zoroastrian terms is not a he or a she and is basically the connective consciousness of the world (kinda like the force and panpsychism), so we don't believe in a God the same way Abrahamics do.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]Why am I still seeing your posts? I don’t want to see your posts. You promised to block me... now keep your promise![/quote]
Why do you want to her to block you? Are you afraid of her?
Why do you want to her to block you? Are you afraid of her?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 not at all. I am but one of many annoyed by her vacuous droning.
We had an arrangement, but now she has broken it. Common courtesy requires her to go away
We had an arrangement, but now she has broken it. Common courtesy requires her to go away
Sharon · F
@newjaninev2 @GodSpeed63 [quote]I am but one of many annoyed by her vacuous droning[/quote]
I'm another, annoyed by her inane ramblings.
I'm another, annoyed by her inane ramblings.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
NortiusMaximus · M
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 @Sharon @Bushranger @NortiusMaximus [quote]I am but one of many annoyed by her vacuous droning.[/quote]
Why?
Why?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 spurious claim after spurious claim which, when shown to be spurious, are simply repeated. Revealed as deceptive, she simply retreats behind a cloud of copy-pasted bible quotes like an octopus seeking concealment.
There’s not an original thought to be found in any of her posts.
There’s not an original thought to be found in any of her posts.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 or is that you? Sometimes it’s difficult to separate the two
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Oh, no, that’s right... you’re the one who likes to make a negative claim and then ask others to prove it. You’re the one who asks for evidence and when given that evidence, pretends that it isn’t evidence, but never says why not. Of course, all that is interspersed with random [i]unsupported[/i] claims about some or other magical entity
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 You forgot the habit of either not answering questions directly, or just ignoring them if they are difficult for them.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger ah, yes, of course... remiss of me, as it’s one of his most common behaviours
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 Both of them, really.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]spurious claim after spurious claim which, when shown to be spurious, are simply repeated. [/quote]
What are you talking about?
[quote]Oh, no, that’s right... you’re the one who likes to make a negative claim and then ask others to prove it. You’re the one who asks for evidence and when given that evidence, pretends that it isn’t evidence, but never says why not. [/quote]
Again, what are you talking about?
What are you talking about?
[quote]Oh, no, that’s right... you’re the one who likes to make a negative claim and then ask others to prove it. You’re the one who asks for evidence and when given that evidence, pretends that it isn’t evidence, but never says why not. [/quote]
Again, what are you talking about?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Did I forget almost constant disingenuity?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 @Bushranger [quote][quote]Did I forget almost constant disingenuity?[/quote]
Well, that answers my question, you have no clue of what your talking about, Newjaninev. Please, learn to spell. Thank you.
Well, that answers my question, you have no clue of what your talking about, Newjaninev. Please, learn to spell. Thank you.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 Learn how to present an actual argument before you criticise others' spelling. And perhaps check the spelling to make sure you aren't in error.
1-25 of 26