Religion & Spirituality

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

WILL SCIENCE DISPROVE GOD? [Spirituality & Religion]

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXey0X0CxjU]

You know where I stand on this question.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

In the right hands a proper interpretation of scientific findings could threaten belief in God, for the evidence supports another possibility: that nature/chance (by itself) can provide us with eternal life. In this scenario the idea of God would be ridiculed as selling that which is already assured. Of course, some would still prefer the addition of colorful characters as told in wildly inaccurate story form.

1-25 of 32

Pfuzylogic · M

@SW-User
hawking and penrose tried to expand on Einstein’s work and it has completely fallen apart by the third round of data received by the Gaia satellite. The amount of elements is wrong and the brightness of the stars is wrong. They now think that using red shift is an errant method to measure the speed that the universe is expanding.

SW-User

@Pfuzylogic No thing is without parallel save that which is together all things. Regardless of the ability to prove escalating inflation this maxim holds true.

Pfuzylogic · M

@SW-User It is best to cite evidence in supporting your views. Most professional scientists have learned to watch pressing the belief button with Sir Roger Penrose because like any man he is looking for attention even with his latest Nobel Prize regarding the Inflation theory.

SW-User

@Pfuzylogic I found Hawking to be a pretentious media grabber with his sensationalist claims. And Richard Dawkins fails to command any respect from me.

Pfuzylogic · M

@SW-User hawking and penrose completed their dominance of scientific thought together.
We are in agreement there.
Science is data driven and hopefully theories will be based on that again!

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@SW-User [quote]In the right hands a proper interpretation of scientific findings could threaten belief in God,[/quote]

Not a chance. Yahweh is the Author of true science.

SW-User

@GodSpeed63 If that were so we should expect empiric evidence of God. I only claim that the available evidence better fits a hypothesis where nature provides eternal life. If you wish to say that God created nature then I won't stop you.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@SW-User [quote]If that were so we should expect empiric evidence of God.[/quote]

It's right in front of your nose.

Sharon · F

@GodSpeed63 [quote]It's right in front of your nose.[/quote]
You've been asked several times how the existence of everything around us is evidence [b]of your specific god[/b] rather than one of the many others or of some other phenomenon. Thus far you have never been able to so your unsupported opinion is totally worthless.

SW-User

@GodSpeed63 There's no evidence for God in front of my nose. An apple doesn't say MADE IN HEAVEN. It could just as easily be a product of nature.

SW-User

@SW-User @Sharon Right in front of nose seems to be his fall back statement when he is struggling to find an evidence 😂
He told the same statement to me too.
It seems he wants everyone to believe a lie instead of Truth.

Sharon · F

@SW-User He doesn't seem able to understand that, even if our existence is evidence of [b]a[/b] god, it isn't necessarily [b]his specific god[/b].

SW-User

@Sharon True. A real God doesn't ignore the good deeds of people simply because they do not worship him. Purpose of a true God, if exist, is to guide people in the path of goodness. He is probably not understanding because his thoughts are biased after reading some stories.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@SW-User [quote]There's no evidence for God in front of my nose[/quote]

There' plenty of evidence in front of your nose. There's no one more blind than those who will not see the work of God.

Pikachu

@GodSpeed63

Give an example of evidence AND (here's the challenging part) [i]explain [/i]why it's evidence for god.

Aaaaand go!

SW-User

@GodSpeed63 Na. There's none more blind than those that fail to realize that infinite chance operations will guarantee complex designs.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@SW-User @Sharon [quote]A real God doesn't ignore the good deeds of people simply because they do not worship him. [/quote]

8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast. Ephesians 2:8 & 9

5 I am the Lord, and there is no other; There is no God besides Me. Isaiah 45:5

Don't take my word for it, take His.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@SW-User [quote]There's none more blind than those that fail to realize that infinite chance operations will guarantee complex designs.[/quote]

Prove it.

SW-User

@GodSpeed63 No need to. If you cover all possibility you have everything.

Aliveshock

@SW-User
If you demonstrated just a smidgeon of knowledge of Science you might have some credibility for a teen!

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@SW-User [quote]No need to.[/quote]

Then you have no proof which makes your statement not true.

SW-User

@GodSpeed63 Quite the contrary. We find lots of proof in the connective range of things around us. In fact, we have all the proof available- for if this doesn't suggest the full exploration of possibility what else will?

Aliveshock

@SW-User That sounds like the biggest load of BS I have ever heard. You said absolutely nothing girl.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@SW-User [quote]We find lots of proof in the connective range of things around us. In fact, we have all the proof available- for if this doesn't suggest the full exploration of possibility what else will?[/quote]

Where?

Sharon · F

@GodSpeed63 [quote]Then you have no proof which makes your statement not true.[/quote]
So, as you have no real proof your "yahweh" even exists, your admit your claim that he/she/it does is not true. Well done!

1-25 of 32