Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

True Science Confirms The Account Of Noah's Ark In The Word Of God [Spirituality & Religion]

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82j1IqwA6P0]

True Science Comes Through Again!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
[b]Twenty-one Reasons Noah’s Worldwide Flood Never Happened[/b]
Here’s a geologist’s critical analysis of false perceptions held by many
creationists about the origin of the Grand Canyon and the age of the
Earth.
LORENCE G. COLLINS

http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/Nr38Reasons.pdf

[b][c=#BF0000]1. The stair-stepped appearance of erosion of sedimentary rocks
in the Grand Canyon with sandstones and limestones forming
cliffs and shales forming gentle slopes cannot happen if all
these rocks were deposited in less than one year. If the Grand
Canyon had been carved soon after these rocks were deposited
by a worldwide flood, they would not have had time to harden
into solid rock and would have been saturated with water.
Therefore, the sandstones and limestones would have slumped
during the carving of the canyon and would not have formed
cliffs. (Hill et al. 2016)
2. Salt and gypsum deposits, more than 200 feet thick, occur in
the Paradox Formation in Utah just 200 miles north of the
Grand Canyon, and these deposits are the same age as the
Supai rocks in the Grand Canyon that were supposedly also
deposited by Noah’s flood. Similar salt deposits, up to 3,000
feet thick, exist in various places on all continents and in
layers of all geologic ages, and these deposits can only be
produced by evaporation of sea water. Such evaporation could
not have happened in repeated intervals in the midst of the 40
days and 40 nights of raining and during the supposed
continuous deposition of sedimentary rocks by a worldwide
flood and in which the only drying and evaporation is said to
have occurred at the end of the flood. (Collins 2006, 2009,
2012; Hill et al. 2016)
3. Sand dunes with giant cross bedding occur in the Mesozoic
rocks in Zion National Park and are further evidence that
desert conditions occurred at the time of the supposed flood.
(Senter 2011; Collins 2017)
4. Fossilized mud cracks occur in the Cambrian Tapeats
Formation on top of the Precambrian Vishnu schist at the
bottom of the canyon and indicate that drying conditions
existed during the alleged worldwide Noah’s flood, and these
drying conditions occurred at the very beginning of this
supposed flood. Although mud cracks can also form in mud
under water by compression that squeezes out water from the
mud, such compression is not likely to occur during a flood.
Moreover, fossilized mud cracks are found in other formations
that were supposedly deposited during Noah’s flood, and these
mud cracks occur in red shales that coexist with salt and
gypsum layers. Therefore, these mud cracks were likely
formed in deltaic mud flats that were exposed to the
atmosphere where their iron-bearing minerals reacted with
oxygen in the air to form

5. Raindrop prints occur in many places around the world which
could not have been formed or preserved if the muds (now in
shales) containing these prints were deposited under water
during Noah’s flood. (Senter 2011; Hill et al. 2016)
6. Nests of dinosaur eggs are found in several places around the
world, and it is illogical that dinosaurs could have had enough
time to create these nests and lay their eggs while they were
fleeing from rising waters to reach higher ground. (Senter
2011; Hill et al. 2016)
7. The White Cliffs of Dover on the eastern coast of England
consist of chalk layers, up to more than 350 feet thick, that are
composed of fossilized coccoliths (a kind of algae), and these
layers are the same age as the sedimentary rocks that overlie
giant cross-bedded sandstones in Zion National Park, and
therefore, they were supposedly also deposited by Noah’s
flood. But coccoliths are very tiny and have chloroplasts that Because of this fact, all of them could not have been living at the same
time to depths of 350 feet in the one year in which the flood is said to
have occurred because that many organisms in the water at the same
time would have blocked out the sun from organisms below the nearsurface.
[/c][/b]


And so on....
@Pikachu This reminds me of the scene in the first Captain America when skinny cap keeps getting beat down but gets up and says I can do this all day. Lol The punches keep coming.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]And so on....[/quote]

So?
@GodSpeed63

[quote]So?[/quote]

So there are 14 more scientific evidences which show that the Noachian flood did not and could not happen.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]So there are 14 more scientific evidences which show that the Noachian flood did not and could not happen[/quote]

Learn to spell. That article still doesn't prove that the account of the flood in the Word of God didn't happen.
@GodSpeed63

lol based on the fact that you're upset enough to attack spelling, i'd say that article has you stumped.😉
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]based on the fact that you're upset enough to attack spelling, i'd say that article has you stumped.[/quote]

You'd be wrong. That article doesn't have me stumped at all.
@GodSpeed63

So pick some of those examples and prove them wrong. Not just deny them, but explain specifically where they are in error.
If you can't then i have you stumped. Simple as that.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Pikachu Besides, almost all the dinosaurs had been wiped out long before Noah's time... Some 65M years before, in fact! The Chalk exposed by the White Cliffs of Dover is older still.

I find Biblical literalism not only misses a few vital but simple points, but is deeply though unwittingly disrespectful to the God it thinks it is protecting.
@ArishMell

Get out of here with your demonstrable, observed facts!
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Pikachu LOL!