Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

One more HUGE nail in the coffin of Young Earth Creationism is the problem of heat from radioactive decay. [Spirituality & Religion]


Short version:
If the Earth were really 6,000 - 10,000 years old, the heat energy generated by radioactive decay occurring at the speeds necessary to produce the results we observe today would have boiled the oceans and scorched the earth into a radioactive wasteland.

Sorry creationists, it just didn't happen that way🤷‍♀️

Longer version:
As you know, the atoms of some elements spontaneously decay and form atoms of another element. This process is known as radioactive decay and it's the law of radioactive decay which allows us to date minerals.
Using known half lives (the time required for half the original substance to be gone) of certain elements are what allow us to do this reliably and these measures are corroborated by numerous independent means of relative dating.
This in itself precludes a young earth (sorry creationists) but that's not the problem we're discussing.
This process produces tiny amounts of energy and spread over 4.6 billion years are unnoticeable. Just as you can slowly rub your hands together to no effect but rubbing them quickly generates significant heat, the rapid radioactive decay which young earth creation would demand would release catastrophic levels of heat.
In order to achieve the decay levels that we observe today in just 6,000 year, the heat that would necessarily have been generated would have boiled the oceans and scorched the earth into a radioactive wasteland.

Sorry creationists, it just didn't happen that way🤷‍♀️
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
Wrong. There has never been a coffin for the truth of a young earth and never will be. You're either reading facts wrong again or you're just making this up to look smart. You can't kill the truth of God, my friend.
MrBill36 · 100+, M
@GodSpeed63 what do you say to the many pre-christian civilizations who date their existence back tens of thousands of years?
@GodSpeed63

I note that you have not AND WILL NOT present any argument which refutes the evidence i have presented here.

Funny that.
@MrBill36

lol The Egyptians seem to have totally missed the fact that they were all drowned in the Noachian flood only a few years before they once again hand a civilizations hundreds of thousands strong and full of history and architecture...
MrBill36 · 100+, M
@Pikachu you mean the biblical flood? Aaaaahhhh yes, another story taken from hundreds of accounts from much earlier civilizations and woven into that book.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu
I note that you have not AND WILL NOT present any argument which refutes the evidence i have presented here.

The evidence may be there but your conclusions of it is out in left field facing the wrong way.
@GodSpeed63

Can you be specific about what you feel is inaccurate or a non-sequitur about the conclusions drawn here or are you just announcing your discontent with the conclusion?