This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
Atheists can't reject God because they're already dead in the ground under their headstones. Skeptics reject God by choosing not to believe in Him even though they claim that they are not convinced that He lives. They are without excuse being that God, Yahweh, has already proven Himself to mankind and that His grand design of the heavens and the earth is clear evidence that He lives. This is Truth that God established long ago and no one can alter it or change it.
@GodSpeed63
1) An atheist is someone who does not believe or disbelieves in the existence of a deity. That’s it.
Many such living people exist. You can say they replace god in their lives with other things but they do not believe these things are gods and so they are indeed atheists.
Moving on.
2) God has not proven his existence because if he had then by virtue of his omnipotence he would have succeeded and everyone would know he was real.
Since everyone does not know he's real, he either has not proven himself or is not omnipotent.
Those are your only two choices🤷♀️
3) You've only repeated the claim under scrutiny. You have offered no argument.
If you can make an [i]argument[/i] for that claim then i'd be happy to hear it.
Why don't you begin by sharing the results of the exercise that i assigned.
I'll keep asking you about it so you might as well just share it right off the bat and get it over with it.
Although i suppose if you ignore it, that will be an answer in and of itself.
I await your thoughtful and pertinent response.
1) An atheist is someone who does not believe or disbelieves in the existence of a deity. That’s it.
Many such living people exist. You can say they replace god in their lives with other things but they do not believe these things are gods and so they are indeed atheists.
Moving on.
2) God has not proven his existence because if he had then by virtue of his omnipotence he would have succeeded and everyone would know he was real.
Since everyone does not know he's real, he either has not proven himself or is not omnipotent.
Those are your only two choices🤷♀️
3) You've only repeated the claim under scrutiny. You have offered no argument.
If you can make an [i]argument[/i] for that claim then i'd be happy to hear it.
Why don't you begin by sharing the results of the exercise that i assigned.
I'll keep asking you about it so you might as well just share it right off the bat and get it over with it.
Although i suppose if you ignore it, that will be an answer in and of itself.
I await your thoughtful and pertinent response.