Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Christians often try to justify the punishment of unbelievers with the idea that they CHOOSE not reject God but i've never seen a refute to this: [Spirituality & Religion]

The atheist does not [i]reject[/i] god because rejection is a willful act.
Atheists simply aren't [i]convinced[/i] that god exists and they can no more [i]choose[/i] to be convinced than you can as a believer.

And you can prove this to yourself right here and now.
Observe:

Decide [i]right now[/i] that you are in fact convinced that Santa Claus exists....
...were you successful? No? Then you've just proven to yourself that belief is not a choice.
You cannot [i]choose[/i] to be convinced by that which you find unconvincing.

So maybe you still think un-believers [i]deserve[/i] to burn forever for simply not believing but at least don't try to justify the punishment by victim blaming.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
It's an "if I can do so can you" mentality. Not realizing people are not all equal and what convinces one will not convince another. Apparently God is going to burn you for him not making you equal. How dare you not be convinced to the same standard>:(
@canusernamebemyusername

I do see that a lot.
A believer can earnestly say "look at the stars and the flowers!" and wonder why i don't find that proof of the god of Abraham.