Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

They say God doesn't prove he exists because that would violate free will. How? How does knowing god is real force us to love him? [Spirituality & Religion]

This appears to be the accepted excuse for why literally billions of humans are not going to receive salvation and it appears totally facile as a justification.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
Yahweh doesn't want to force you to love Him. Where'd you get that nonsense from?
@GodSpeed63

Yahweh doesn't want to force to love Him

Never suggested that he did.
Please re-read the question more carefully and answer appropriately.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu
How does knowing god is real force us to love him?

Read your own script will you?
@GodSpeed63

Reading comprehension: try it out.
🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️
" HOW does knowing god is real force us to love in him."
As in "I do not believe knowing god is real forces us to love him".
lol how can you so completely fail to grasp the idea?

Holy crap.
Ok, i trust i've clarified your mistake to you.
No re-read the question and answer appropriately.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu
No re-read the question and answer appropriately.

I see comprehension is not your cup of tea. It seems to me that you can't comprehend your own question.
@GodSpeed63

*sigh*

Ok.🤦‍♀️
I'm just going to give you the benefit of the doubt here.
It was just an honest miscommunication.

When i ask "How does knowing god is real force us to love him?" i am saying that i do not believe that knowing god forces us to love him and therefore the excuse that knowing god is real would be a violation of free will is erroneous.

How do you respond to this idea?
@GodSpeed63

When i ask "How does knowing god is real force us to love him?" i am saying that i do not believe that knowing god forces us to love him and therefore the excuse that knowing god is real would be a violation of free will is erroneous.

How do you respond to this idea? Do you have a rebuttal?