This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 51-55, M
The aspects of it that are proven. But you have to be an atheist to believe that the speculative parts are proven
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP What parts do you think is proven? Curious.
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 51-55, M
@hippyjoe1955 natural selection, mutation, adaptation... what's often called "micro-evolution"
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP Adaptation is not evolution it is a built in design feature. Apart from microbes mutations almost never work out. The mutated creature is always weaker and more likely to die before reproducing than a non mutated creature. Could you please expand on your idea of natural selection?
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 51-55, M
@hippyjoe1955 is there any point? If you do the same thing with it as you just did with mutation, I don't think there's any point
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP I am simply pointing out that evolution doesn't work macro or micro. Yes creation was endowed with the ability to adapt to changing circumstances. That is part of its design. Brilliant design I would say.
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 51-55, M
@hippyjoe1955 I agree, God's creation is a pretty amazing thing. And I'd like to understand how He made it, but I'm not going to be able to do that if I blow off things that don't contradict the Bible but are backed up by good science