Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

God Created [Spirituality & Religion]

I will be removing all rude and condescending comments.

There are currently 829 comments and so many of them are rude and condescending!

Currently, there is a rather misleading thread which asks...

"For my creationist friends who reject that evolution has occurred: What do you consider to be the best COUNTER-EVIDENCE that evolution has occurred?"

This question is misleading. Most Creationists believe that God created a world with many Kinds of creatures and that these creatures multiplied and grew in diversity. We believe that God used genes as building blocks for creatures in the same way that we might use cement to build very different structures. Similarities between creatures that are of different Kinds are simply the result of having the same building blocks. A dome structure and a skyscraper might both use cement but the similarity means nothing. It means nothing in biology as well.

Similarities between organisms might be used to classify organisms but using similarities to make assumptions about origins is ridiculous!

I am, however, thankful that God gave each Kind of creature the genetic ability to become diverse. So, we have many kinds of birds... many breeds of dogs... etc. Some call this ability evolution... but it does not imply that dogs came from an ancient bacterial ancestor. lolol.

So, does evolution occur? Yes, within each Kind of animal, of course! Does that mean that Darwin's dream might have merit? Of course not. The intricacies of nature and the masterful use of genetic building blocks implies a Creator... an organic architect and engineer.

[media=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U0u3-2CGOMQ]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Kstrong · 56-60, F
Evolution, mutations and adaptations within the species towards habitat and environment.... correct...

Common decent.... yes, the same Creator
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Kstrong Did it run out of ideas, or did it just introduce poor engineering into species just for fun... just for a laugh?

Come to that... why have different species?
SW-User
@Kstrong never mind newjaninev2. She's in denial that her theory of Evolution has been debunked, and is no longer taken seriously. She prefers to pretend that's it's a "God did it" argument, which is true enough (God did create all things), but it's a distraction to her denial that the scientific evidence no longer supports the theory that species evolve from previous life forms.

Of course, you know why. They don't have to acknowledge God while pretending that evolution is true. This would be only sad for her, if it weren't so tragic.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
NewBecky · 51-55, F
Condescending comments will yet be deleted, even after all of this time.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@SW-User You seem determined to ignore requests for evidence, so perhaps I should stop embarrassing you in that regard. I'll just accept that you are making unsupported claims about something you patently do not understand.

For more than the last century millions of scientists have spent their time trying to falsify the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection (I am one of them), but without success. It is mortifying that you have succeeded in that, yet will not reveal how you achieved such a wonderful feat. I assume you are humble and do not want the acclamation and recognition that would accompany such a feat.

Most exciting of all is that such a falsification will inevitably result in the development of an even better Theory, so I look forward to seeing what you have discovered. Please go ahead and share it now.

I am, however, uncertain as to why you feel that falsifying the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection would in any way confirm creationist claims. After all, it's not an either-or choice (as you know, that would be a Bifurcation Fallacy). Additionally, whatever replaced the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection would still require evidence, as does anything else, including creationist claims.

In short, falsifying one does not automatically validate the other.
Kstrong · 56-60, F
@SW-User agreed.... Luke 19:40... im not bothered, shes entitled to her opinion.... i cant deny what ive seen and what ive experienced...
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Kstrong
shes entitled to her opinion

We're all entitled to our own opinions, but we're not entitled to our own facts.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment