God Created [Spirituality & Religion]

I will be removing all rude and condescending comments.

There are currently 829 comments and so many of them are rude and condescending!

Currently, there is a rather misleading thread which asks...

"For my creationist friends who reject that evolution has occurred: What do you consider to be the best COUNTER-EVIDENCE that evolution has occurred?"

This question is misleading. Most Creationists believe that God created a world with many Kinds of creatures and that these creatures multiplied and grew in diversity. We believe that God used genes as building blocks for creatures in the same way that we might use cement to build very different structures. Similarities between creatures that are of different Kinds are simply the result of having the same building blocks. A dome structure and a skyscraper might both use cement but the similarity means nothing. It means nothing in biology as well.

Similarities between organisms might be used to classify organisms but using similarities to make assumptions about origins is ridiculous!

I am, however, thankful that God gave each Kind of creature the genetic ability to become diverse. So, we have many kinds of birds... many breeds of dogs... etc. Some call this ability evolution... but it does not imply that dogs came from an ancient bacterial ancestor. lolol.

So, does evolution occur? Yes, within each Kind of animal, of course! Does that mean that Darwin's dream might have merit? Of course not. The intricacies of nature and the masterful use of genetic building blocks implies a Creator... an organic architect and engineer.

[media=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U0u3-2CGOMQ]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Adstar · 56-60, M

The absolute stupidity of evolution is that they have never been able to demonstrate / observe sterile matter spontaneously transforming into simple life under natural conditions.. This is the foundation of evolution that life spontaneously came into existence from sterile matter under the influence of the forces of the universes..

The moronic evolutionist propagandists focus on Adaptation and do their best to keep everyone they are brain washing focused on Adaptation which is only a part of the theory of evolution.. Most people have no problem with Adaptation, observing it happen as breeders both plant and animal breeders use selective breeding the slowly change a given organism over many generations..

But again they have NEVER demonstrated or observed life coming into existence from sterile matter EVER.. For their evolution theory to be correct Life must be able to come into existence spontaneously from sterile matter.. But it doesn't!!!!

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@Adstar You’re confounding abiogenesis and evolution.

They’re two different topics.

redredred · M

@Adstar Those are two different things, you can see it right there in Darwin’s book title, the “Origin of Species” refers to speciation or the evolution of all life, not it’s origin.

Does that actually have to be explained to anyone with at least a sixth grade education? So,Nate you ignorant or just duplicitous?

Adstar · 56-60, M

@redredred The theory of evolution has been used as an argument against creation.. It's one of the main battering rams used by anti-christs trying to disprove the existence of God.. Now how can a theory be used to disprove that life was created if you and your atheist friends now state that the theory of evolution does not deal with how life cam into existence????????

Don't be stupid.. The theory that life came into existence from sterile matter is an integral part of the evolution stupidity... That's what i have been told since i was in primary school,, In 6th grade if you like.. That the theory of evolution disproves that creation happened.. That life was NOT created, that it came into existence spontaneously as i detailed in my first post..

I think you are the one being duplicitous...

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@Adstar

how can a theory be used to disprove that life was created

It isn’t. That’s the point. You’re completely mistaken... abiogenesis and evolution are two different topics.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@Adstar

since i was in primary school

Then it’s time you learned that abiogenesis discusses how life forms, whereas evolution describes what happens after life has formed.

redredred · M

@Adstar you are seriously confused. You may not like the indisputable truth of evolution of all life but no serious geneticist claims to know the origin of life nor would they assert their specialty does explain it.

I’m open to any citation you can provide where one does.

Adstar · 56-60, M

@newjaninev2

how can a theory be used to disprove that life was created

It isn’t. That’s the point. You’re completely mistaken... abiogenesis and evolution are two different topics.

The you and your friend here should step in and intervene when ever a evolutionist claims that evolution disproves creation.... Hint you will be getting a LOT of opportunities to do so..

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@Adstar I have absolutely no interest in trying to disprove something that is unfalsifiable... which is also why science has no interest in creationist claims that ‘goddidit’. Such a claim explains nothing (not even itself) because it tries to merely explain everything away.