Given the overwhelming evidence of Evolution through common descent...what would you consider to be the best COUNTER evidence to evolution? [Spirituality & Religion]
What evidence would you point to showing that evolution actually DID NOT happen?
@GJOFJ3 Scientific theories are modified as new evidence comes to light. That's the beauty of science, it's self correcting as nothing is set in stone.
Evidently you misunderstand what "theory" means in a scientific context. I suspect you are using the colloquial definition which is more akin to a hypothesis or a guess. In science, a theory is not a guess, it's the best, most comprehensive, consistent and predictive explanation of a set of data. Would you consider the germ THEORY of disease (the basis for modern medicine) to be "just a theory" ?. Do you disagree that much of human disease is caused by bacteria and viruses? No, of course you don't so why would you assert that evolution is a theory because it lacks convincing evidence?
There is no reason to attempt to disprove something that there is no proof of.
There is a great deal of evidence for evolution. Example:
Here we see fossils of dinosaurs which are understood to be the ancestors of birds. We see that they possess features which are common to reptiles (eg> teeth, long, bony tails and snouts). But these same specimens also possess features which are common to birds (eg> feathers both insulating and asymmetrical, grasping feet and hollow bones. You'll notice that, that is actuallythe definition of a transitional form. Beyond that, we even see fossil evidence of behaviour from dinosaurs which is more typical of birds in the form of brooding.
And then we get to the modern species like ostriches, emus and cassowary (incidentally, birds which most resemble ornithomimid theropod dinosaurs) which possess very saurian-like claws on their wings in just the way we would expect from a limb which was once a forelimb rather than a full wing.
And then we get into the genetic evidence which shows that modern birds still possess the genes for saurian features like teeth and long tails! A situation which is NOT reversed. That is to say, reptiles do not possess dormant avian genes, which effectively invalidates any argument that a god just used the same materials to make different creatures.
So you see, there is in fact a great deal of observed evidence for evolution.
So you see, there is in fact a great deal of observed evidence for evolution.
Are you showing those pictures on here again, bud? They don't show evolution. Good Grief, man, don't you have anything better to do than push a lie on people?
Ah...so in fact you have no response or rebuttal to the data i presented to you. How intellectually dishonest of you.
I'm sorry, for a moment i thought you might be actually interested in facts and simply unaware of the evidence. Evidently facts are not important to you to make up your mind.
If you grow tired of sticking your head in the sand and feel you could actually debate me then you're welcome back. Until then you've lost my interest and my attention.
Nothing that you quoted or referenced proves evolution.
The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is the best explanation we have for the observed facts. No scientist is attempting to prove evolution, quite the opposite in fact, they're attempting to disprove it. If you can show where the theory is wrong, publish a paper of your findings. You'll be well on the way to a Nobel Prize.