This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Sharon · F
To disprove evolution, one needs to propose a theory that better fits all the observed facts. Thus far none of the creationists/evolution deniers have been able to do that. The claim that "goddidit" is a non-starter unless they can present some supporting evidence. Just proving that this "god" thing exists would be a start.
@Sharon Also I have never seen them propose a mechanism for goddidit. Only a what did it. That is like having ingredients and a finished cake but leaving the making out.
Sharon · F
@canusernamebemyusername [quote]Also I have never seen them propose a mechanism for goddidit. [/quote]
They can't, it's a completely unsupported claim. They seem to think "goddidit" answers all questions when, in fact, it just avoids them. Saying "goddidit" without explaining where this god thing came from just adds another layer and leaves another question unanswered.
They can't, it's a completely unsupported claim. They seem to think "goddidit" answers all questions when, in fact, it just avoids them. Saying "goddidit" without explaining where this god thing came from just adds another layer and leaves another question unanswered.