Evoltuion's Big Lie [Spirituality & Religion]

@redredred Indeed... in fact, it’s fundamental to the field

@redredred I must share this with you... I just read some piece of nonsense by some or other muppet who refers to ‘the creationist literature’

Too funny!

@newjaninev2 Well, the greatest literature is fiction so...

@redredred lol!

@redredred [quote]Well, the greatest literature is fiction so...[/quote]

You got that right. The theory of evolution is the greatest fiction of all time.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]the greatest fiction[/quote]

If only it weren’t for all that pesky evidence.

Speaking of the evidence...

@GodSpeed63 Upon what basis do you consider repeatable, peer-reviewed, demonstrable scientific processes "fiction"?
Is it your bronze-age mythology recorded in error-ridden documents by people who didn't even understand germ-theory?

@redredred [quote]Upon what basis do you consider repeatable, peer-reviewed, demonstrable scientific processes "fiction"?[/quote]

The ones that evolution scientists keep misinterpreting which seems to be in every field of science; especially biology and paleontology.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]scientists keep misinterpreting[/quote]

I have told you before, and I’ll tell you yet again.

The evidence [i]doesn’t require interpretation[/i].

The evidence requires [b]explanation[/b]

The most consistent, complete, and coherent explanation of the evidence is the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.

Do you have a more consistent, complete, and coherent explanation of the evidence?

Evidence that you claim doesn’t exist, except that when presented with even a tiny part of the evidence you run away from it.

@GodSpeed63 What "ones"? I asked you for A basis, singular. What credentials do you possess to disregard peer reviewed, repeatable and demonstrable processes?

@redredred [quote]What credentials do you possess to disregard peer reviewed, repeatable and demonstrable processes?[/quote]

The Spirit of Truth and the Knowledge of the Word of God who created science for the benefit of mankind.

@GodSpeed63

Science certainly does benefit mankind. It's just that you like to cherry pick it and when it conflicts with your worldview, deny it.

It's not a position which is logically defensible.
It's a position of faith in spite of evidence.

End of story.

@Pikachu [quote]t's not a position which is logically defensible.
It's a position of faith in spite of evidence.[/quote]

Not end of story. God, Yahweh, has the final Word on logic since He's its Author.
It's a position of faith because of evidence.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]created science[/quote]

What do you think science is? There's nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. Which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?
[i]Dr. Steven Novella[/I]

To which we can add:
Which part of that exactly did your magical entity create? Do it create thoroughness? Do it create careful observation? Do it create being systematic? Did it create the use of consistent logic?

@GodSpeed63 Just a reminder that you have yet to account for the fact that the pseudogene scar is on the same nucleotide for every species of ape?

The same nucleotide out of 6.4 billion nucleotides.

I gave you three options, and even invited you to add more if you could justify them.

You still have not accounted for the identical mutation on every species of ape

Additionally, you have not accounted for the identical cytochrome c mutation that prevents all primates from synthesising their own vitamin C

Again I gave you three options, and even invited you to add more if you could justify them.

Additionally, you have not yet commented on the developmental embryology example that I gave you.

Can you now offer a timeline for those responses?

@GodSpeed63 [quote]because of evidence[/quote]

You seem to have problems with evidence... both in supplying it and in responding to it.

@newjaninev2 [quote] Just a reminder that you have yet to account for the fact that the pseudogene scar is on the same nucleotide for every species of ape?[/quote]

So? That still doesn't mean evolution has occurred. You see all the works of Yahweh and still think evolution occurred. You really need to accurately interpret science, otherwise you're just whistling in the wind.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]You seem to have problems with evidence[/quote]

Not at all, but looks like you do. The evidence is there, you just don't know how to read its codes.

@GodSpeed63 Oh, it’s encoded? Let me guess... you’re an expert cryptologist, are you? How clever of your magical entity to encode its message... much wiser than speaking clearly, plainly, and helpfully

@GodSpeed63 You have yet to account for the fact that the pseudogene scar is on the [i]same[/i] nucleotide for every species of ape

The same nucleotide out of 6.4 billion nucleotides.

I gave you three options, and even invited you to add more if you could justify them.

You still have not accounted for the identical mutation on every species of ape

Additionally, you have not accounted for the identical cytochrome c mutation that prevents all primates from synthesising their own vitamin C

Again I gave you three options, and even invited you to add more if you could justify them.

Additionally, you have not yet commented on the developmental embryology example that I gave you.

So, given that you have yet to account for the fact that the pseudogene scar is on the same nucleotide for every species of ape, can we now take it that you rescind your earlier claim that there is no evidence for evolution?

Can we therefore take it that you accept evolution [i]and[/i] common ancestry?

@newjaninev2 [quote]You have yet to account for the fact that the pseudogene scar is on the same nucleotide for every species of ape[/quote]

You have yet to show evidence that God, Yahweh, doesn't live. If you're not willing to meet me half way, then why should I meet you half way?

@GodSpeed63 There are 40,000 god and godlettes, which one is yours and please provide proof acceptable to even a traffic court that your chosen god is the right one. By the way, the handbook from his fan club is not proof.

@redredred [quote]There are 40,000 god and godlette[/quote]

There's only one true God, Yahweh, who lives forever and was never created. Those other 39,999 were created by man and do not live, period.

@GodSpeed63
How do you know that to be true?

@CookieLuvsBunny [quote]How do you know that to be true?[/quote]

I'm a Born Again Believer in Jesus Christ and have God's Holy Spirit of Truth abiding in me.