Evolultion Debunked By Archeology [Spirituality & Religion]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVuVYnHRuig]
61-69, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Who is this snake-oil merchant?
He’s hilarious! What’s his name?
He speaks as if carbon-14 dating and radiometric dating were equivalent... [i]they’re not[/i]
They’re two completely different things.
Carbon-14 dating works well for archeology, because it goes back only 50,000 years (the new process called Accelerator Mass Spectrometry gives even better results).
Carbon-14 dating is [b]never[/b] used for fossils
He does a good job of selling Walt Brown’s books (the real purpose of this video), but knowingly lies while doing there (Brown does [i]not[/i] have a Ph.D. in physics)
A high-schoolstudent could dismantle this stream of sophistry... but neither the student nor I would bother.
The video is pure piffle, designed to confuse its audience, mislead the gullible... and line the pockets of those associated with it.
He’s hilarious! What’s his name?
He speaks as if carbon-14 dating and radiometric dating were equivalent... [i]they’re not[/i]
They’re two completely different things.
Carbon-14 dating works well for archeology, because it goes back only 50,000 years (the new process called Accelerator Mass Spectrometry gives even better results).
Carbon-14 dating is [b]never[/b] used for fossils
He does a good job of selling Walt Brown’s books (the real purpose of this video), but knowingly lies while doing there (Brown does [i]not[/i] have a Ph.D. in physics)
A high-schoolstudent could dismantle this stream of sophistry... but neither the student nor I would bother.
The video is pure piffle, designed to confuse its audience, mislead the gullible... and line the pockets of those associated with it.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]Who is this snake-oil merchant?
He’s hilarious! What’s his name? He speaks as if carbon-14 dating and radiometric dating were equivalent... they’re not They’re two completely different things.[/quote]
Is that the best you can do? Praise God for men and women who are not afraid to spread the truth of God, Yahweh's, goodness.
He’s hilarious! What’s his name? He speaks as if carbon-14 dating and radiometric dating were equivalent... they’re not They’re two completely different things.[/quote]
Is that the best you can do? Praise God for men and women who are not afraid to spread the truth of God, Yahweh's, goodness.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 You seem to have missed this bit...
He speaks as if carbon-14 dating and radiometric dating were equivalent... [i]they’re not[/i]
They’re two completely different things.
Carbon-14 dating works well for archeology, because it goes back only 50,000 years (the new process called Accelerator Mass Spectrometry gives even better results).
Carbon-14 dating is [b]never[/b] used for fossils
He speaks as if carbon-14 dating and radiometric dating were equivalent... [i]they’re not[/i]
They’re two completely different things.
Carbon-14 dating works well for archeology, because it goes back only 50,000 years (the new process called Accelerator Mass Spectrometry gives even better results).
Carbon-14 dating is [b]never[/b] used for fossils
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]Carbon-14 dating works well for archeology, because it goes back only 50,000 years (the new process called Accelerator Mass Spectrometry gives even better results).[/quote]
Carbon-14 dating does not go back to 50,000 years. The earth isn't that old.
Carbon-14 dating does not go back to 50,000 years. The earth isn't that old.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 All evidence to the contrary notwithstanding?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]All evidence to the contrary notwithstanding?[/quote]
All evidence points to a young earth contrary to what you believe.
All evidence points to a young earth contrary to what you believe.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Ah yes, the evidence you often mention... but never show
CharlieZ · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 "All evidence points to a young earth..."
ALL evidence?
Wich documented one? May you give as a link to it´s source (no to comments nor conferences based on it) in a scientific publication (not a pamphlet)?
How much young than the one meassured by scientists?
ALL evidence?
Wich documented one? May you give as a link to it´s source (no to comments nor conferences based on it) in a scientific publication (not a pamphlet)?
How much young than the one meassured by scientists?