This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Carazaa · F
Evolution is illogical faith without evidence. Creation is faith that is logical.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Carazaa No, the evidence for evolution is overwhelming. This is why it’s both scientific fact and theory.
Carazaa · F
@QuixoticSoul No
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Carazaa Yes.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
@Carazaa @QuixoticSoul @Pikachu
Perhaps the 3 of your can read this and then have a more meaningful debate
https://www.iep.utm.edu/faith-re/
It seems to be unbiased, showing the history of the conflict and confluence of faith and reason.
Perhaps the 3 of your can read this and then have a more meaningful debate
https://www.iep.utm.edu/faith-re/
It seems to be unbiased, showing the history of the conflict and confluence of faith and reason.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Carazaa [quote]Evolution is illogical faith without evidence. Creation is faith that is logical.[/quote]
Amen to that!!
Amen to that!!
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@JoeyFoxx That’s a good summary of the philosophical systems we’ve built up to deal with the concept of faith (as always, Kierkegaard is my favorite here, because he accepts and owns the fundamental irrationality of religious belief).
But it’s not all that relevant to this particular topic, because the topic has little to do with religious faith. Denying evolution isn’t really about faith, god, reason, etc. It’s about denial of evidence - piles and piles of interdisciplinary evidence, akin to stubbornly maintaining that the earth is flat.
To take Gould’s definition of a scientific fact - it’s data that’s been "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent". That is what we are dealing with.
But it’s not all that relevant to this particular topic, because the topic has little to do with religious faith. Denying evolution isn’t really about faith, god, reason, etc. It’s about denial of evidence - piles and piles of interdisciplinary evidence, akin to stubbornly maintaining that the earth is flat.
To take Gould’s definition of a scientific fact - it’s data that’s been "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent". That is what we are dealing with.