Top | Newest First | Oldest First
As somebody trained as a scientist, the two things I take away are the existence of dark matter, once verified as not an experimental error, says something about the fundamental forces of nature. These fields aren't coupling to the electro-weak or strong sectors-- so we have new fields, new forces. This is the whole point of physics so that's exciting.
The other is that if this dark matter couples to the gravitational sector of our existing understanding of things, then what is that coupling, and if it couples all, then everything we pretend to know about the effects of the large scale structure of the universe is fucked.
As a religious person I have no idea what this has to do with religion. Reconciling faith with science and vice versa is just cowardice. It means we don't trust either our spiritual faculties or our scientific ones. Only the two playing well together.
The other is that if this dark matter couples to the gravitational sector of our existing understanding of things, then what is that coupling, and if it couples all, then everything we pretend to know about the effects of the large scale structure of the universe is fucked.
As a religious person I have no idea what this has to do with religion. Reconciling faith with science and vice versa is just cowardice. It means we don't trust either our spiritual faculties or our scientific ones. Only the two playing well together.
Quizzical · 46-50, M
We'll just have to wait and see what develops and if there was indeed a mistake in their calculations.
That's the great thing about science, it's ready to admit when it might be wrong and will move on to improve things.
That's an important part of the scientific process
That's the great thing about science, it's ready to admit when it might be wrong and will move on to improve things.
That's an important part of the scientific process
bookerdana · M
I guess the more you know the less you know.
Why is this only for Atheists? George Lemaître first derived the what is now known as Hubble's law,as well as The Big Bang
Why is this only for Atheists? George Lemaître first derived the what is now known as Hubble's law,as well as The Big Bang
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@bookerdana I think it was to avoid the 'it's all part of God's plan' crowd.
bookerdana · M
Or the new creationism folks @Quizzical
Quizzical · 46-50, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
Cosmology is total wild west, a new revolution every five years. But interesting.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
[b]Paragraph 10[/b]
[quote]Thus far there is no evidence for most of these ideas[/quote]
Tells you all you need to know.
[quote]Thus far there is no evidence for most of these ideas[/quote]
Tells you all you need to know.