Last thread kind of got derailed lol. To my theist peeps: Is it reasonable when the answer is unknown to conclude that god is the answer? [Spirituality & Religion]
Many creationists will say "I can't see how life could have evolved, therefor i am justified in believing god did it". Is that a justified rational? Many will recognize this as a logical fallacy known as an argument from incredulity: If i don't know how x could be then i am justified in believing y.
Do you think this kind of thinking is a reliable way of knowing what is true?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@Pikachu The strength of an Atheist's argument is inversely proportional to the length of time it takes the opposing theists to attempt to derail the debate or resort to ad hominem attacks.
