Last thread kind of got derailed lol. To my theist peeps: Is it reasonable when the answer is unknown to conclude that god is the answer? [Spirituality & Religion]
Many creationists will say "I can't see how life could have evolved, therefor i am justified in believing god did it". Is that a justified rational? Many will recognize this as a logical fallacy known as an argument from incredulity: If i don't know how x could be then i am justified in believing y.
Do you think this kind of thinking is a reliable way of knowing what is true?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@Pikachu The strength of an Atheist's argument is inversely proportional to the length of time it takes the opposing theists to attempt to derail the debate or resort to [i]ad hominem[/i] attacks.
