Last thread kind of got derailed lol. To my theist peeps: Is it reasonable when the answer is unknown to conclude that god is the answer? [Spirituality & Religion]

Many creationists will say "I can't see how life could have evolved, therefor i am justified in believing god did it". Is that a justified rational?
Many will recognize this as a logical fallacy known as an argument from incredulity: If i don't know how x could be then i am justified in believing y.

Do you think this kind of thinking is a reliable way of knowing what is true?