Atheism is a philosophy of negation, devoid of an argument. Why do then atheists continue their harping? [Spirituality & Religion]

A premise, or a conclusion is something one arrives to through an argument. Atheists, however, try to arrive to one through negation.

The sheer simplicity of the athiest's ignorance is admirable. But it shows they're not philosophically inclined, but ideologically.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

1. there's no proof that gods exist (otherwise we'd all be theists)
2. there's no proof that gods don't exist (they might be lurking around a mountain-top somewhere)
3. in any event, there's no compelling necessity to even postulate gods, and the postulation explains nothing... it merely tries to explain everything away.
4. therefore, I have no gods (I'm an agnostic atheist)

Please point out the ideology behind that conclusion

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 The evidence of the existence is far greater than the evidence of atheistic evolution. Atheists simply refuse to look at the evidence proffering instead their own nonsense and claiming it is evidence.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@hippyjoe1955 [quote]atheistic evolution[/quote]

What is that supposed to be?
it's as meaningless and pointless a term as 'theistic evolution'.

There's just evolution.

Deal with it (or not, depending on your capacity for learning)

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 you don't understand English. The shock I feel right now..

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@hippyjoe1955 Lmao this nonsense again.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@QuixoticSoul Just having fun with an evangelical atheist. She is not smart enough to be taken seriously.

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@hippyjoe1955 joe, you're dumb as a rock, stop projecting.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@QuixoticSoul No, But it certainly appears as though you are. They used your IQ number to define the temperature of melting snow.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@hippyjoe1955 [quote]evangelical atheist[/quote]

You've never been able to identify the doctrine about which 'evangelical atheists' would be evangelical, yet you persist in using the term [i]i.e.[/i] you constantly use a term you know to be meaningless.

Given your history of deception, such behaviour is somehow unsurprising

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 We know that dearie. As i said before you just aren't very bright so big concepts like that elude you.

Pikachu

@hippyjoe1955

[quote] The evidence of the existence is far greater than the evidence of atheistic evolution.[/quote]

Oh great. So let's examine the evidence by discussing specific data and the relative explanatory power of creation vs evolution for said data.

Aaaand that's where you back down.
Always. Every.
Single.
Time.

Speaks for itself, doesn't it?

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@hippyjoe1955 Big concepts like oxymorons? How very deep and meaningful!

Do you understand that putting two words together don't necessarily result in a meaningful phrase?