This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Miram · 31-35, F
The scientific method was born out of separation between science and religion, by Ibn El Haithem. Science doesn't point out to anything supernatural as an explanation and it doesn't need to.
As to balance, the word is too subjective. In physics all is moving to disorder, entropy and that can't be seen as a balance. And there is the chaos theory, you can't predict all even if you determined rules.
Also the idea that there needs to be a conscious entity/mind is the product of physical laws within this system. It is a natural and primitive phenomenon, the need to feel connected to something bigger than the self, for security it provides. That's the cause and effect.. A creator as described in the main three religions isn't natural and is outside of this system. He can't be detected here and cause and effect don't apply to him. And therefore it is irrational to think of him as a cause. The creationist argument is self contradictory the more you explore it.
As to balance, the word is too subjective. In physics all is moving to disorder, entropy and that can't be seen as a balance. And there is the chaos theory, you can't predict all even if you determined rules.
Also the idea that there needs to be a conscious entity/mind is the product of physical laws within this system. It is a natural and primitive phenomenon, the need to feel connected to something bigger than the self, for security it provides. That's the cause and effect.. A creator as described in the main three religions isn't natural and is outside of this system. He can't be detected here and cause and effect don't apply to him. And therefore it is irrational to think of him as a cause. The creationist argument is self contradictory the more you explore it.