Heeeeyyy, my creationists! Would you say that creationism is falsifiable? [Spirituality & Religion]

@hippyjoe1955

Yes. Lots.
And when i share it you say "that's just an interpretation" to which i reply "yes, and that interpretation is more consistent and coherent than a creation model"
And on and on.
You know there's evidence, joe. And you know you can't explain away most of it.

Unless you have something new to offer i suggest we ignore eachother in this thread😉👍

You may of course actually answer the question i asked....

@Pikachu So what about those fossil records that have no transition species. Logic or just gloss over?

@hippyjoe1955

There are many transitional fossil in the record. Here's a link:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html

But we're not actually debating evolution here, joe.
I'm asking creationists if creationism is a falsifiable position. Creationists often like to claim that creationism is scientifically supported but obviously science is falsifiable.
So is there any hypothetical evidence which could prove creationism to be wrong?

@Pikachu Explain the Cambrian explosion.

@hippyjoe1955

Certainly.
If you promise to answer the question of this thread.
Do we have a deal?

@Pikachu Explain the Cambrian explosion

@hippyjoe1955

I will. When you agree to then answer my question.
Tell me we have a deal and then i will explain the cambrian explosion to you an you will answer the question i posed in this thread.

So, do we have a deal? Yes or no?

@Pikachu What is the point of your question? None. You are a fundamentalist incapable of debate or thought. Sad.

@hippyjoe1955

Please don't be so quick to judge, joe. You know what happens when we assume....😉

But let me help you out. The point of my question is twofold:

1st: I'm genuinely curious to see what creationists think of their belief. If there's any possible way they would admit that they were wrong and
2nd: following that realization, would they stop attempting to claim the legitimacy of science since their belief can then not be considered scientific.

Let this serve as a lesson, joe. Just because you don't know the answer or the purpose does not mean there isn't one. Don't be arrogant

@Pikachu So you keep bringing up the same lame topic and refuse to do any thinking about the nonsense you spew and you don't believe you are a fundamentalist. Pity.

@hippyjoe1955

Ok...not sure how that was a pertinent response to my post...

lol
Anyway, once again you've really put me in my place, joe. That must be very gratifying for you.

So having achieved that and since you're afraid to answer my question and are evidently here in a combative capacity, let's go back to the ignoring one another😏

@Pikachu Next time try to think. You are simply showing yourself to be an opinionated uninformed goof.

@hippyjoe1955

Duly noted. When you feel brave enough to actually answer my question, you're welcome back.
Until then, ta ta!😁

@Pikachu I can wait until you answer mine.

@hippyjoe1955

I will...when i have your word that you'll then answer mine. You've been avoiding agreeing to that and i can only assume that you're afraid to do so.

Like i said, when you're brave enough, we can pick this up again.
Now please excuse me, i have mundane chores to attend to.

@Pikachu Nice dodge. You see I just falsified your pet theory. Sad for you.

@hippyjoe1955

It's not a dodge, joe. It's response to my familiarity with you. I know from experience that you'll refuse to answer questions when you feel your answer is weak or when you have no answer at all.

I'm happy to explain the cambrian explosion to you.
I just want this to be a two-way street.

When i explain the cambrian explosion, do i have your word that in addition to any discussion on that topic, you will immediately answer my original question?

It's a simple yes or no, joe. The decision of whether or not this interaction progresses is yours alone...

[center]your mind is closed. You can't even look at the real science refuting evolution. Sad.

@hippyjoe1955

Yes or no, joe.
Simple as that. What are you so afraid of?

@Pikachu you are the one refusing to look at the evidence not me. Sad.

@hippyjoe1955


😕
Joe. I'm not refusing anything. Have i not been clear?
I'm just asking for a declaration of good faith. When i answer your question, you will answer mine.

Just say you'll answer my question and this discussion moves forward.
The only one refusing anything is you.

P.S can i just say how much i'm enjoying your obvious mimicry of trump's style of writing?😁

@Pikachu Of course you are. You are refusing to answer the most basic questions about evolution. You simply take it on faith that it is real and true and never question it. Sad. Not a scientist at all.

@hippyjoe1955

My dude, this thread is not about evolution. It's about creation.
Even so, i was willing to humour you.

🤷🏻 My terms are clear joe.

Come back when you're brave enough to meet them

@Pikachu Of course it is as it always is with you. You simply disguise it by attacking creationism. How sad is that? Can't defend your own so you attack everyone else.

@hippyjoe1955


lol catch you later, joe