Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The Case For Christ [Spirituality & Religion]

https://youtu.be/Ikxb09pyZwM
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
No joke. I'm kinda pissed off.
I have been asking you and asking you for extra-biblical evidence of a divine christ and you kept telling me to watch your youtube video.

This guy uses 95% [i]BIBLICAL[/i] evidence. And what's not biblical is conjecture (well the disciples couldn't remove the body because they had no means motive or opportunity. Oh yeah? And you know that how?)
Look at all these documents we have! Matthew, Mark, Luke, John. Oh...so the bible still.

If the story of jesus dates back to near the time it was meant to happen then it must be true. As if this exact this does not happen to this day.
His followers gathered around his creed because of facts they knew to be true...
So then just asserting that the myth is true and they knew it.

I've done my part. I trust you'll show me the same courtesy in response to the transitional forms.
I also hope you'll finally see fit to share all this extra-biblical evidence for a divine christ
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu The video was for your benefit, not mine. I told you that I'm no scientist but those people are. You wanted scientific evidence that God lives and that Jesus is real. There are two more videos on here that you haven't seen yet as far as I know.
@GodSpeed63

....you didn't watch your own video, did you?
But let me be clear: There is a big, HUGE difference between jesus having been a real rabbi who lived and jesus being the son of god.

I'll consider watching your[i] over an hour long[/i] video if you show me that you've read the link i sent you by making commentary on it in the same way i commented on your video.
This is a two way street, my dude.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu Videos. I watched all three of them and all three made sense to me. Whether they make sense to you or not is a different story. If you're only out to prove evolution, then you're leaving the Truth in the bleachers and you're batting with a blind fold on. I'm telling you this because that's what your colleagues in science do whenever they do those tests that you keep harping about. They're not looking for truth, they're looking to prove evolution.
@GodSpeed63

No. Actually they're looking for truth. The way they do that is by following the evidence of the natural world.
You need to STOP this disrespectful trivialization and vilification of the beliefs and motivations of people who don't accept your idea of god.
Science accepts evolution [i]because that is where the evidence points[/i].
The fact that they do not reach the conclusions that you want them to reach does not mean that they're not looking for the truth.

I don't know if this disrespect stems from contempt or from ignorance by i will not tolerate it.

Anyway, if you think you're up to debating the evidence for evolution then simply say the word. Let's see which conclusion may be logically and consistently drawn from the evidence.
You say that truth is important to you. So let's put that declared value to the test.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu No, the evidence points to God every time. He's the one who created science and put it in motion. All evolution does is let known the progress that scientists discover after each testing but within its own boundaries set by God. Evolutionists don't understand this and take the meaning of evolution further than it's supposed to go in order to accommodate their disbelief in God. I'm not saying this out of disrespect to anyone, I'm saying this because it's the truth. It's not my truth I'm sharing but God's truth. It's His truth that has me and not the way around. It's His heart that has me as His son so that my heart has Him as my Father. I'm not here to get you to believe what I believe but to believe in God's truth and let you deal with it as you wish.