Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should a Christian man ask his fiancé for a prenup? [Spirituality & Religion]

Your opinion, no answer is wrong. Why or why not?
sweetiepoo · 36-40, F
Question: "What does the Bible say about prenuptial agreements?"

Answer: Although prenuptial agreements are not mentioned in the Bible, God does tell us how we are to view marriage, and from that we can figure how agreements such as “pre-nups” would be viewed. First, God intended marriage to be permanent, lasting as long as both spouses are alive. When two Christian people go into a marriage, it should be with the strong belief that divorce is not an option. To have a prenuptial agreement allows for the possibility of divorce. When God formed Eve from Adam’s rib, He was signifying the purpose of a husband-and-wife relationship. The woman is the man’s helper, taken from under his protective arm and formed from the same flesh. “That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). Obviously, being “one flesh” means that a husband and wife should not even consider separating. The only reason the Law ever allowed divorce was the people’s hard-hearted insistence on divorce as a right (Matthew 19:8). God never changes, and He despises divorce (Malachi 2:16).

The love described in 1 Corinthians 13 should obviate the need for prenuptial agreements. Biblical love is a conscious decision that we are going to do what is best for others the way God always does what is best for us. “Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres” (1 Corinthians 13:4–7). As Christians, we should be characterized by this kind of love, especially within a Christian marriage. If love “endures through every circumstance” (NLT), then prenuptial agreements are unneeded.

In Ephesians 5, we learn a lot about the roles of a husband and wife in marriage. Husbands are called to love their wives with the same love that Christ showed the church (verse 25)—a love that did not shrink from sacrifice. Wives are to honor their husbands and submit to their leadership (verse 22). Just as Christ will never leave us, a husband should never leave his wife. Husbands should love their wives as they love themselves (verse 28), and wives should respect their husbands (verse 33).The biblical model of marriage teaches the permanence of the union and the necessity of selflessness; prenuptial agreements, by their very nature, cast doubt on the permanence of the union and foster selfishness.

There is no reason for two Christian people, committed to God and each other, to need a prenuptial agreement. Yes, both the husband and wife will sin, but “love covers over a multitude of sins” (1 Peter 4:8). God calls us to forgive each other just as He has forgiven us, but a pre-nup is a plan to not forgive. If two truly become one, shouldn’t the distinction between “yours” and “mine” be eradicated—or at least greatly blurred?

Many in today’s society consider prenuptial agreements to be necessary and that anyone who does not sign one is a fool. But God’s ways contradict the world’s (Luke 16:15; Romans 12:2). Nothing in the Bible supports the idea that a Christian engaged couple should forge a “just in case we get divorced you can’t take my stuff” agreement.

Source: Gotquestions.com
SW-User
@sweetiepoo So, even though you said "no answer is wrong," by posting this, you're saying there is a wrong answer.
sweetiepoo · 36-40, F
@SW-User No, I am simply sharing more insight on MY opinion.
SW-User
@sweetiepoo Okay. It would have been nice if you mentioned that first. It was feeling a bit like a trap to me.
SW-User
I don't think religious affiliation should have anything to do with a prenup. They are used by people who want to protect their assets in case of divorce. I see nothing wrong with it. Unless my rich boyfriend asks me to sign one. Then it's wrong. 😄
@SW-User Ha ! 😄
Statistically in the United States conservative Christians have the highest rate of divorce-- so maybe this is really a non-question?
@CopperCicada I'm surprised about that, although I don't know why. Think they blame it on marriage equality ? 🤔
@bijouxbroussard Here's where people get divorced and how many times they get divorced.

Lolco · 36-40, M
Yes, if he has amassed wealth before you, as well as vice versa.
4meAndyou · F
Christian wedding vows vary. This is the one I remember: " I, ________, take you, ________, for my lawful wife/husband, to have and to hold from this day forward, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and health, until death do us part."

The vow promises that the husband and wife will stay together whether they are rich or poor (together), whether they are healthy or ill (together).

The vows do not specify that the husband should decide to be rich while forcing his wife to remain poor.
NiftyWhite · 46-50, F
@4meAndyou pre-nups aren’t JUST about assets. they can also assign who does what kind of chores in the house. even if it is for assets, a prenup for assets doesn’t mean that won’t lové one another for richer or poorer, it just means that IFFFFF they divorce for any reason, he doesn’t split or forfeit his established assets with his ex wife. Someone who owns a business perhaps, or owns many properties would prob be wise to do this and if it was my hubby, i would take ZERO offense.
fazer1k · 56-60, M
@4meAndyou It might be the wife who is the rich one. The vows don't say you can't use a prenup either.
4meAndyou · F
@SW-User Ugh!
Doomflower · 36-40, M
Every person should just be themselves and we should do away with government contracts on our sex lives.
@Doomflower If it's only about sex, absolutely. But choosing to live together, share property, have children, build families and being responsible for each other longterm is a bit more complicated than simply having a sex life.
It's a personal thing. I would go for a prenup, it doesn't mean you believe your marriage will fail and your spouse will take everything from you, it's just a safety net.
Shit happens.
I think when two people agree on a prenup it shows love and maturity but that's just me.
I think it’s smart but also a huge romance killer. Depends on your views with property and such. I wouldn’t care if I guy I was marrying wanted one because I have my own assets.
SW-User
Christian or not, I am all about the prenup 😌 Especially if I am worth much more than my wife to be.
Mona86 · C
@SW-User and men become smoochers, when they are being taken care of, especially when they don’t want to use their own monies!!!😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬
SW-User
@Mona86 I have never heard of a smoocher. 🤷
Mona86 · C
Men haven’t smoochers are male equivalent of good diggers @SW-User
Quizzical · 46-50, M
Everyone should. You must protect your interests.
Mona86 · C
If he wants a prenup I’ll get one to
SW-User
@Mona86 That would be the way to go IMHO.
SW-User
I think it would be a smart thing to do, Christian or not. Although it is definitely making a statement about your relationship with the person. If I marry someone and money is the first thing on my mind, then perhaps I shouldn't be getting married.
fazer1k · 56-60, M
What has being Christian got to do with protecting oneself using a prenup?
SW-User
What's Christianity got to do with protecting your assets?
LadyBronte · 56-60, F
What religion got to do with a prenup?
NiftyWhite · 46-50, F
if any man feels he needs to, then he should.
Depends on how Christians view marriage and if he's a traditionalist.
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
sorry i dont understand?
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
@sweetiepoo dunno what prenup is. Sounds like pregmancy
fazer1k · 56-60, M
@MartinTheFirst Prenuptial agreement that (primarily) wealthier people use to protect their assets in case the marriage goes wrong.
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
@fazer1k ooh. No a christian shouldnt do it... even if it might bite them in the end

 
Post Comment