could the world no be as old as scientist/evoutionistss insist? [Spirituality & Religion]

@Lynda70 if there is a test that could prove it i would love to know. my question is why are you so threatened by ths?

@ladycae I don't feel threatened by you. Why do you think I do? All I was saying is that Potassium-Argon dating can be used for very old items. I'm surprised anyone would suggest Carbon dating anything that old unless they know Potassium-Argon would prove them wrong.

i am not a scientist and sorry not up on things like how things are dated. but i would love those tests does. if you look my question was a question because i don't know and would like to yet athiest came out and spent hours trying to argue with me. that's why i feel they were threatened. i would think everyone would want to know what this means.

@Pikachu it was my take on the evidence as it was 60 minutes. for you it's that Jurassic park is a possibility. i made the question based on my take away. so no it isn't misleading.if you wish to use the video for a question from your takeaway it is not mine, feel free to use it. personally, i think recreating dinosaurs is both reckless and scary but to each his own.

@ladycae

I didn't really think jurassic park was on the horizon. They haven't found any intact strands of DNA sufficient to make a dinosaur and it's unlikely that they ever will. I'm just saying that I don't think your takeaway was well founded on the subject matter of this video.

@Pikachu and as i said too each his own. if the world is not as old as evolutionists think it blows their theory all to hell. i for one find that immensely interesting. i think that creation and evolution can fit well together given what we know but how exciting to see everything turned up on it's head should this disprove the age of the earth. whole new frontiers opened on study. i think it's a lot more exciting than a Jurassic park scenario. Who knows what the future might hold.

@Agent86 agreed but shh. we don't want them to know they go nuts. lol

@Agent86 the fact that evolutionists rely completely on fossils proves how flimsy their theory is; in reality, the only thing any fossil tells us is that it died, not when, not how, not who it's ancestors or descendants were, etc. as evolutionists would have society believe...

The only accurate biological means to date is via dendrochronology (aka. tree ring counting); and while evolutionists like to assume some trees/forests are ancient, and certain trees can live for tens of thousands of years; the oldest cut/cored trees are no more than 5,000+/- years old

@Qwerty14 at this point it is believed that soft tissue can not live more than around 500 years which dinosaurs roamed the earth less than 500 years ago which throws off all our timelines on the age of the earth. if soft tissue is found in other fossilized bones which it has it becomes a question of either how old is the earth or how long can soft tissue survive. and actually yes birds and dinosaurs share a common genus and humans are not related to apes, that is a totally different group who died out. now if evolution ever finds their missing link, who knows about homo sapiens. they still say we descend from apes because we share 98 chromosomes alike. but we also share 60% with bananas, 35% with rice plants and our closest match are fruit flies. we also share chromosomes with worms and house flies, in fact, we share chromosomes with every living thing.

@ladycae Sounds like you've been watching too many Christian science videos.

@Qwerty14 no, i've done a lot of studies. i have never seen a Christian science video.