Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Which came first Religion or God? [Spirituality & Religion]

Poll - Total Votes: 16
Religion
God
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
human beings are not gullible or lacking in the independence of mind. Human beings are smart and curious and nobody’s fool. I mean all are vulnerable at some time in Life and group think is a powerful mechanism. Still the general thesis that religion creates God is flawed imho.


Imho God is a projection of the human psychological architecture. We externalise our individual micro level experience into a macro level construction. We are omnipresent in our own lives and we are omnipotent in our own lives. It is a step of astonishing simplicity to imagine that our own dual nature of conscious/ unconscious is indicative of the nature of meta reality. The functional advantage of doing so is to make a God in Humanity’s image to legitimate our own nature.

Of course God is also dysfunctional in certain aspects and once the true nature of God is understood and shared then will evolve also. Denial of God serves just to suppress this necessary evolution.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Cierzo · M
Religion came first. God never 'came'. God was always there. Our human vanity just tried to build a cage of words and features for God.
sogdianrock · 61-69, M
hi Cierzo
I am an atheist. So please forgive me for not understanding your answer. How could religion come first if God was always there? Surely religion is a human social activity by definition?
Best wishes
Cierzo · M
Only what was not there may come.
sogdianrock · 61-69, M
hi Cierzo
I am am unable to understand your formulation of language.
Best wishes
:)
Cierzo · M
@sogdianrock That's because you are an atheist. Eternal is a language you don't understand
sogdianrock · 61-69, M
hi Cierzo
I am an atheist but I do understand infinity in so far as the human mind can.
For what it is worth I agree with Philosopher Nick Bostrom who stated that "Unless we are now living in a simulation, our descendants will almost certainly never run an ancestor-simulation."
Best wishes
:)
Cierzo · M
@sogdianrock Now it is me who does not understand what he means
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Cierzo [quote]God was always there[/quote]

If it's in any way valid to make such a claim, then it would be equally valid to say that the universe was always there... and that has the advantage of simplicity, because it removes the unnecessary postulation of magical entities.

'Eternity' is one of those concepts that humans think they understand... until they try to understand it. After all, what's half of eternity? Wouldn't it be... eternity? Wouldn't [i]any[/i] minuscule portion of eternity be... eternity?

If so, wasn't the last microsecond eternity?