Are we going backwards in terms of Women’s Human Rights?
56-60, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
I said no because there was no other option!
I actually believe we are going backwards on all HUMAN rights! Not just women's rights.
This scandal wasn't just about women! It's about everyone's rights. Please note this is not the only major issue the supreme court is or has ruled about.
Freedom of speech has been ruled as a greater right than freedom of religion. When in the constitution mentions freedom of religion first.
So think how this applies to Roe versus Wade! Is it not a freedom of religion right?
[quote][c=000000]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; [/c]or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[/quote]
I actually believe we are going backwards on all HUMAN rights! Not just women's rights.
This scandal wasn't just about women! It's about everyone's rights. Please note this is not the only major issue the supreme court is or has ruled about.
Freedom of speech has been ruled as a greater right than freedom of religion. When in the constitution mentions freedom of religion first.
So think how this applies to Roe versus Wade! Is it not a freedom of religion right?
[quote][c=000000]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; [/c]or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[/quote]
DailyFlash · 56-60, M
@DeWayfarer freedom of and from religion go hand in hand. We should have separation of church and state protecting us from decisions based on religious beliefs.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@DailyFlash yet the SCOTUS has ruled otherwise already!
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ynotisay Yes! There was a debate about this on this site already a few days ago!
Literally almost everyone was ok with that ruling! It was a freedom of speech case about flags a city allowed to fly for a certain religious group. The SCOTUS unanimously ruled the church should be allowed to fly their flag because other groups are allowed!
Freedom of speech my as*! That was in preparation for this upcoming ruling!
No group should be allowed to fly their flag on any City property, should have been the ruling!
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/02/supreme-court-says-boston-should-have-allowed-christian-flag-on-city-property.html
Literally almost everyone was ok with that ruling! It was a freedom of speech case about flags a city allowed to fly for a certain religious group. The SCOTUS unanimously ruled the church should be allowed to fly their flag because other groups are allowed!
Freedom of speech my as*! That was in preparation for this upcoming ruling!
No group should be allowed to fly their flag on any City property, should have been the ruling!
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/02/supreme-court-says-boston-should-have-allowed-christian-flag-on-city-property.html