Are we going backwards in terms of Women’s Human Rights?
56-60, M
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
View 2 more replies »
SW-User
@DailyFlash I can't see how you get that idea unless it helps you feel better about aborting a baby.
SW-User
@Pitchblue WHAT IF died. Why not make sure you aren't making babies you are evidently not going to want or support? You know, BEFORE you get to abortion stage.
therighttothink50 · 56-60, M
[image deleted]@DailyFlash
Carissimi · 70-79, F
Yes, we are going backwards because they don’t know what a woman is, until it comes to abortion. Then all of a sudden, they remember. They have men competing in female sports, and undermining the women’s efforts. They don’t use the word “mother” because men can have babies too, according to their warped brains. Yes, definitely going backwards, but not because of SCOTUS.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
I said no because there was no other option!
I actually believe we are going backwards on all HUMAN rights! Not just women's rights.
This scandal wasn't just about women! It's about everyone's rights. Please note this is not the only major issue the supreme court is or has ruled about.
Freedom of speech has been ruled as a greater right than freedom of religion. When in the constitution mentions freedom of religion first.
So think how this applies to Roe versus Wade! Is it not a freedom of religion right?
[quote][c=000000]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; [/c]or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[/quote]
I actually believe we are going backwards on all HUMAN rights! Not just women's rights.
This scandal wasn't just about women! It's about everyone's rights. Please note this is not the only major issue the supreme court is or has ruled about.
Freedom of speech has been ruled as a greater right than freedom of religion. When in the constitution mentions freedom of religion first.
So think how this applies to Roe versus Wade! Is it not a freedom of religion right?
[quote][c=000000]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; [/c]or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[/quote]
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ynotisay Yes! There was a debate about this on this site already a few days ago!
Literally almost everyone was ok with that ruling! It was a freedom of speech case about flags a city allowed to fly for a certain religious group. The SCOTUS unanimously ruled the church should be allowed to fly their flag because other groups are allowed!
Freedom of speech my as*! That was in preparation for this upcoming ruling!
No group should be allowed to fly their flag on any City property, should have been the ruling!
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/02/supreme-court-says-boston-should-have-allowed-christian-flag-on-city-property.html
Literally almost everyone was ok with that ruling! It was a freedom of speech case about flags a city allowed to fly for a certain religious group. The SCOTUS unanimously ruled the church should be allowed to fly their flag because other groups are allowed!
Freedom of speech my as*! That was in preparation for this upcoming ruling!
No group should be allowed to fly their flag on any City property, should have been the ruling!
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/02/supreme-court-says-boston-should-have-allowed-christian-flag-on-city-property.html
Yes, White Nationalist Christians on the Supreme Court. One of the organizers of Jan 6th insurrection is married to a lifelong member of the Supreme Court.
Peaceandnamaste · 26-30, F
I’m moving to Canada. America is too politicized.
eli1601 · 70-79, M
@Peaceandnamaste Say hi to the truckers
Peaceandnamaste · 26-30, F
@strongbow tell men to also use condoms.