Creative
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What’s scarier, quicksand or spontaneous human combustion?

[image/video deleted]
[image/video deleted]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Quicksand / mud. That is real, though probably not as the video clip.

People do occasionally become trapped in quicksand (a slurry of sand and water) or mud on tidal shores, and can be caught by the incoming tide, or die of hypothermia. The emergency services have special equipment and methods for rescuing them.

Farm workers have also been killed in a way akin to drowning, having fallen into grain-silos.

[Pauses to scroll the one-second videos completely off the display.]

"Spontaneous human combustion" is a myth from a very small number of people having been burnt to death alone, by accidents whose causes were not recognised or investigated. Or were, but the real cause did not satisfy the fantasists.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@ArishMell I think Charles Dickens has a lot to answer for in his novel Bleak House where he has one character spontaneously combust in wonderfully described terms.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@FreddieUK Is that where it came from? I expect the belief already existed but Charles Dickens was never one to waste a lurid myth.

Nor come to that, was Arthur Conan Doyle - he talked up the Mary Celeste legend, French-ifying the name in the process, and the Cottingley Fairies hoax.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@ArishMell It didn't come from Dickens, but I think he helped propagate it further. One of my favourite writers, so forgive him. 🙂
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@FreddieUK Oh, I don't blame him!