Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How the right claims victimhood.

An article I found interesting:

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/how-the-right-developed-its-victim-complex

In this opinion piece, Paul Elliott Johnson argues that today’s American right—especially Republicans—has developed an ever-expanding victim complex, where many on the right see themselves as oppressed or besieged by liberalism, media, and cultural change.

Key points from the article:

1. A shift from rugged individualism to grievance politics

Historically, conservatives emphasized self-reliance and strength. But in recent decades, that has morphed into a narrative where they portray various policies and social changes—like healthcare reform or critiques of political leaders—as existential threats to freedom. Former President Donald Trump amplified this by framing criticism and accountability (e.g., impeachment or January 6 investigations) as illegitimate “witch hunts.”

2. Politics of outrage over policy

Johnson notes that modern Republican campaigns often feature fear-driven messaging and grievance-based appeals without substantive policy solutions, which reflects how deeply the victim narrative has taken root.

3. Historical roots of conservative victimhood

The article traces this mindset back decades, arguing it has always existed in fragments but only became mainstream over the last 30 years.

Three key historical phases intensified it:

Cold War era: Conservatives saw themselves as marginalized by a bipartisan Washington consensus and fought for recognition.

Post–Cold War period: With the Soviet Union gone, right-wing political identity looked for new enemies—leading to domestic scapegoats and culture wars.

Post-9/11 & post-2008 era: Traumatic national events like the terrorist attacks, financial crisis, and election of Barack Obama fueled a sense of existential threat and humiliation.

4. Consequences in today’s politics
Johnson connects this enduring victim frame to current right-wing reactions: rejection of movements like #MeToo, panic over social issues, and even the rise in extremist actions by some disaffected individuals.

He suggests that without confronting this culture of grievance, the GOP and the broader political system will continue to struggle with polarization and instability.
Top | New | Old
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Conclusion is right, yet I suspect the reasoning is faulty.

Republicans have always worked on the "whatever works basis" the lying and cheating have always been apart of their mind set. Prime Example is Nixon. Secondary example is J Edgar Hoover.

This mind set is nothing but an excuse. Another lie.

Aggression IS apart of the whole outlook. No matter the overt ouook looks like. Second amendment rights is another way to show this.

As long as gun rights are for them they are all for the second amendment. Yet the moment it works against them then the gun holder is the offender.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@BohoBabe No it has always been what works best.

Please read up on how Hoover justified his actions.
BohoBabe · M
@DeWayfarer I was talking about the Republicans as an establishment. Yes, there have always been certain individual Republicans that didn't even pretend to believe in Conservatism. But the entire right-wing establishment, the politicians and the pundits, all of them abandoning everything for authoritarian control, that's new.

It's crazy reading about Watergate now because of how different the Right is. If MAGA was around back then, the entire Right would have defended Nixon.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Convivial · 26-30, F
I think dinosaurs were diagnosed with the same complaint... Inability to get along when circumstances change...
Democracy is not "Let them eat cake" and "The one with the most toys, when they die, wins."
It is about improving the human condition for as many people as possible, health, education and opportunities to make life a good experience.

 
Post Comment