The Roman Empire did not consider a baby to be a "person" until it was 1 year old. Is that the new Dem plan for America?

Two thousand years ago in Imperial Rome, newborn infants were not legal people before their 1st birthday. A mother of an unwanted child could simply toss the infant onto any of their numerous trash heaps. People who wanted to adopt a child could look about on trash heaps, find one still alive, and take it home.

Is that the new Democratic plan for American children? Or are infant body parts too high priced to toss out?

I'm not a Dem insider, but I'm curious where they are going. Just wondering. What is the Dem plan here?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

PoizonApple · 41-45, F

No, Greybare, that is not the Den plan. 🙄

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@PoizonApple Can you provide any proof evidence seems to be on Greybare's side.

ViciDraco · 36-40, M

@hippyjoe1955 what evidence?

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@ViciDraco Did you hear about NY's abortion law?

PoizonApple · 41-45, F

@hippyjoe1955 The evidence is that no one is doing that.

hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M

@PoizonApple So you don't follow the news either. Colour me surprised.

PoizonApple · 41-45, F

@hippyjoe1955 ok

ViciDraco · 36-40, M

@hippyjoe1955 the one where abortion is allowed under any of three conditions: (1) if it is performed earlier than 24 weeks of pregnancy; (2) in an “absence of fetal viability”; or (3) if necessary to “protect the patient’s life or health.”

I don't see the link to the wild speculation. I mean this would be like someone saying the GOP is planning Hispanic genocide and pointing to Trump ordering people at the border to shoot if anyone tries to enter outside of ports of entry.