Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Immigrants are being housed in for profit prisons, most of trump's connections are former private prison lobbyists including Pam Bondi.

Video talking about two major corporations who were in trouble at one point and even stated that the next goal was imprisoning immigrants to fix private prison issues in the news. This video isn't about that, it's only one small detail but it did go pretty dark and deeper than that. Private prisons were in trouble and were going to be phased out, some of the deportation centers are being built by these two corporations. It's really how Trump won is by the private prison corporations.

[media=https://youtu.be/R3YJtGhjH9s?si=exkZas2XXA8LwSp8]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HoeBag · 51-55, F
One thing I do not understand about for-profit prisons (for immigrants or not) - how do they even make money since some prisons do not have manufacturing and the state or fed probably wouldn't give them THAT much extra?

Also if prisons are for profit, how come judges are often reluctant to incarcerate some criminals that could be?

I do not have links or sources on this, just based on hear-say and observations.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@HoeBag For-profit prisons primarily generate revenue through government contracts that pay a fixed per diem rate per inmate, often guaranteeing payment even if facilities aren't full, rather than relying heavily on manufacturing or inmate labor.

They cut operational costs by using low-wage staff, minimizing services like healthcare and cleaning, and charging inmates high fees for commissary items, phone calls, and video visits.

Private prisons like CoreCivic and GEO Group secure contracts from federal agencies (e.g., ICE for immigrants) or states, receiving about $40–$100 daily per inmate depending on security level and location.

These per diem payments cover housing, food, and basic needs, with companies profiting by operating below public prison costs, sometimes 5–15% less after adjustments.

Additional income comes from limited inmate labor (e.g., low-paid work like firefighting) and markups on services, generating billions annually, as seen in recent ICE expansions.

Judges' Sentencing Reluctance:

Judges often hesitate to incarcerate due to overcrowding, high public costs (around $35,000–$60,000 per inmate yearly), and a push for alternatives like probation amid mass incarceration critiques.

They frequently accept plea deals for shorter sentences to manage caseloads and avoid "trial penalties" that prolong detention, not because of private prison profits, which some studies suggest might even encourage harsher sentences via lobbying.

Claims of judges' reluctance tied directly to for-profits stem more from hearsay than evidence; fiscal pressures and policy shifts play larger roles.
HoeBag · 51-55, F
@SatanBurger Well, that was a bit confusing, but I think I get it.
They frequently accept plea deals for shorter sentences to manage caseloads and avoid "trial penalties" that prolong detention,

I am no "law" person by any stretch, but I wonder what circumstances would make someone take a plea deal VS trial, since apparently being found guilty in a trial can mean harsher pentalties. Maybe if the person knows whether they are innocent or not?
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@HoeBag Slave labor is the answer. See, when the 13th Amendment was passed, they made an exception for people who are incarcerated. They can make prisoners work for no money. So the owner of a private for-profit prison has a slave labor force that he or she can contract out for road work, construction projects, or whatever. Imagine having a labor force of 200 people you don't have to pay, and you have your answer.