Why didn't the judge in the E Jean Carroll trial not want these tweets by Carroll
41-45
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ElwoodBlues · M
(1) They had not been entered as evidence for the trial - all evidence needs to be entered in a timely manner so both sides can see it, verify it for accuracy, etc.
(2) Trump had already been found, in a prior trial, to have committed sexual assault, penetrating her with his finger, which constitutes rape in many jurisdictions. That finding is now a matter of law, particularly for purposes of this trial.
[sep][sep][sep][center] UPDATE [/center][sep][sep][sep]
I believe SOME of the tweets were entered as evidence and considered during the trial, but Habba tried to read from other tweets which had NOT been entered as evidence. Mixing all the tweets - evidentiary and non-evidentiary - together in one image is a misleading tactic.
(2) Trump had already been found, in a prior trial, to have committed sexual assault, penetrating her with his finger, which constitutes rape in many jurisdictions. That finding is now a matter of law, particularly for purposes of this trial.
[sep][sep][sep][center] UPDATE [/center][sep][sep][sep]
I believe SOME of the tweets were entered as evidence and considered during the trial, but Habba tried to read from other tweets which had NOT been entered as evidence. Mixing all the tweets - evidentiary and non-evidentiary - together in one image is a misleading tactic.
This message was deleted by its author.