Should we view scientific advancements....

Poll - Total Votes: 10

View Scientific advancements as solutions for human problems despite moral or ethical implications

We should always consider what is morally acceptable first.

You can only vote on one answer.

such as genetic engineering, as a potential solution to human problems like disease, hunger, and disabilities, or should we be cautious about the ethical implications of manipulating life and nature?

Is there a clear line that should be drawn between what is scientifically possible and what is morally acceptable?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

4meAndyou · F

The scientific medical field has a history of rejecting nature. Medical colleges in the past would jeer at herbal remedies, or doctors of homeopathic medicine, who address environment, mind, body and spirit when they attempt to restore health. Insurance companies won't cover homeopathic medicine.

The Hippocratic oath is something that big pharma and the AMA now trample into the mud in their rush to grab more and more money. Children are now being MUTILATED by doctors who have no idea what long term thinking, and/or morality might be.

Nature itself will take its toll. It will punish those who break its boundaries.