Top | Newest First | Oldest First
calicuz · 51-55, M
I believe we already have that. 🤔
View 8 more replies »
ElRengo · 70-79, M
No.
Some and not a few would feel less inhibitions to (let´s say) punch some other.
Even if that one deserves it would be problematic.......sometimes.
But of course there are a lot of nonsense / arcaic inhibitions that need an something from an update to dropping them ASAP.
What we pehaps need is fewer and only some wiser "inhibitions".
Just IMO.
Some and not a few would feel less inhibitions to (let´s say) punch some other.
Even if that one deserves it would be problematic.......sometimes.
But of course there are a lot of nonsense / arcaic inhibitions that need an something from an update to dropping them ASAP.
What we pehaps need is fewer and only some wiser "inhibitions".
Just IMO.
BarbossasHusband · 36-40, M
No. And I won't explain why.
popmol · 22-25, M
Iwillwait · M
Isn't that what we're living in now?
Really · 80-89, M
What IS an hibition?
NO for many.
A few inhibitions saves mankind though.
A few inhibitions saves mankind though.
@popmol [b][c=000000]W[/c][/b]hat?
popmol · 22-25, M
@Lyfis2live no no! a confused "what" with a weird facial expression is "whut"
@popmol 😴
pentacorn · F
no, we evolved to have such for good reasons. it would be mayhem
DDonde · 31-35, M
No, lol
This message was deleted by its author.
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@Spoiledbrat
No.
At least social animals HAVE inhibitions.
Violence within groups and herds have limmits and is less frequent than mutual care / help.
Just to mention one aspect......
No.
At least social animals HAVE inhibitions.
Violence within groups and herds have limmits and is less frequent than mutual care / help.
Just to mention one aspect......