Population grown vs decline

Poll - Total Votes: 17

Have less kids

Have more kids

You can only vote on one answer.

Coming from a developing nation, back in 2000's, population control and ongoing population explosion was made a huge topic. It was advised to have 1-2 kids and lessen burden of resource consumption.

Fast forward 20 years, now it's advised to have a TFR of 2.1 and talks of population decline and demographic dividend shifting to old people is talked upon.

Funny how we moved from one to another paradigm

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

Any given country may be lamenting declining birth rates but the planet as a whole still has waaaaaaaaaaaay more people than it ever did prior to the Industrial Revolution

It shows the legitimate need for the dissolution of nations, instituting a one world (planetary) government, the dissolution of the concept of families, the transfer of procreation from individuals, to something managed in labs by the state, and the adoption of a universal language across the globe

Genelia · 36-40, F

@SW-User The growth rate is already on decline,not growth as such. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/World-population-and-growth-rate-1750-2015-and-projections-until-2100-Source-Roser_fig1_340028898

Secondly due to better medical facilities average life expectancy has gone up, where as the generational growth in population is falling. Japan and China are facing this problem specifically