Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

Labels confuse me. I say my opinions and people can decide what box to put me in. Except I seem to be boxless.

What would you call a person who's too liberal to be called radical, too radical to be called liberal, too lgbtq supportive to be against lgbtq, but too little lgbtq supportive to count as a part of the LGBTQ community?

That's me. Hello. Nice to meet you and no one seem to think I'm enough for any group. 馃槅
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies 禄
SnailTeeth36-40
I wouldn't want to be grouped. Not because I think I'm better than anyone, but rather because I believe generalisation to be more of a human instinct, or knee-jerk reaction. For some people, they will cling to anything as an identity, just to suckle that sweet bosom of validation (I think that's a mammalian trait). Perhaps you should just start your own religion. That seems to be the best way to present your brand without really having to get to know other people. Then other people will model themselves after you. Try and do finger guns as a conclusion to every presentation, that way people know you're cool and relatable enough to be seriously joking. Let Johnny O run your PR.