There are 2 ways of looking at the judgement.

1) conservative approach - women rights are taken away.
2) Neo matrix approach -. Women are already given the right to have sex at their own will but as a consequence, a woman can not supercede the rights of a new born - to be man or woman -to see this world. They have equal right to see this world. How can a woman take the right of someone who can not speak on his/her own?

I

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ElwoodBlues · M

Let Baby Molly teach you the difference between a clump of cells and a person.

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/baby-born-from-27-year-old-embryo-what-this-means-for-the-future

Peterpaul17 · 36-40, M

@ElwoodBlues Science is not developed enough to let a human being survive for so long.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Peterpaul17 Which proves there is a difference between an embryo and a human being. Simple freezing preserves an embryo and kills a human. Therefore they are not the same.

Peterpaul17 · 36-40, M

@ElwoodBlues You have no knowledge of the subject you are talking.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Peterpaul17 I see you are attacking me instead of my argument. I take that as a compliment to the strength of my argument. Thanks!!

BlueVeins · 22-25

@ElwoodBlues I accept your conclusion, but reject your premise. The same logic could be used to conclude that a 10 week old fetus is a person.