Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How to discuss things online

Did it turn out the person you disagree with actually isn't a troll and instead s well educated on the topic and can speak at length on it? Call it a 'word salad'.

Everyone you disagree with is stupid. They are all trolls, by default.

Additionally, you can turn what they said to make them a bad person in some way, not just making it acceptable to treat them rudely, but a moral necessity.

Anyone who expresses a different opinion to you is triggered. They are either incredibly angry or upset and you are always the epitome of stoic. Make sure you invoke that imagery in the discussion. Even if it's only you invoking such emotions, the other person is triggered just by nature of disagreeing with you.

Has someone else's intelligence or productivity made them wealthier or more successful than you, so perhaps their opinion may be worth listening to? Don't worry, they got that success because they are greedy or due to some other moral defect.

Is this person an expert in a field that you are unqualified in, yet due to your ignorance your entire argument is an arguement from authority, majority and consensus? That's okay, '99% of experts' refers to 99% of the experts who you choose to listen to for ideological reasons, those who disagree with you you can just ignore and leave out of that statistic.

Hide your opinions and actions behind the idea that you are defending some group or fighting some injustice, so that when someone more educated than you disagrees with something you do/say, you can dismiss them as encouraging said injustice. And everything you do is right by default and everyone who wants to help the cause you talk about just has to agree with everything you do. No hurt to your ego.

Presenting some skill or talent you are developing but don't want to put in the work to gradually improve? Any criticism, no matter how genuine and constructive, actually comes from 'haters', bad people who because they are bad their opinion you can ignore. You just stay who you are, don't go through any reflection and development.

And lastly, if you are fighting some social justice cause, make sure you are committing the very moral injustice you claim to fight.
Top | New | Old
You sound very angry, as if you are stuck in a polar shift between the left-right paradigm.

Knowing and understanding the difference between the two is key.
Therealsteve · 31-35, M
@MamaButterfly I was pointing out the fallacies that people always engage in rather than just simply providing a counter argument. How does that make me 'angry'?
@Therealsteve I may have misused the word 'angry', perhaps I meant bitter. Either way, I understand the point of your post. I was too quick to respond. I understand your reasoning for pointing out the fallacies of our society. It is nothing but wickedness and decay.
Maybe my wording was wrong.
Therealsteve · 31-35, M
@MamaButterfly or perhaps you could just not assume emotional intention and have a logical argument? :)
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
^ #triggered
Tumbleweed · F
So all if this came from a simple difference of opinion?
Not under authirarian control personally, so, self actualized communication methods developed
I just tend to not these days.

 
Post Comment