Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Can SW be this stupid ?


Hello,

Thank you for your message, and for your interest in VIP.

That functionality that you described doesn't change between non-VIP or VIP. The behavior of Block is exactly the same.

The only thing that changes is that you, with VIP, can block a lot more users (5000 users) than you can without VIP (500 users).

Have a great day!

Regards,
-SW Team



Hi .. Just upgraded to VIP and wish to know if there is a Block Shield , as recently it has become a culture to just block good arguments / conversations. My problem is that they say something and then block depriving me of their final say in the matter.

It would be good if an ordinary member cannot block VIP member and only VIP can block VIP .. or the block must take effect only after a week. For instance I am unable to retrieve contents of this post which is quite important to me as it is my intellectual property.

https://similarworlds.com/society/faith-humanity/5396651-What-is-your-morality-We-often-talk-about-the-moral

Pls check if VIP can read the post even after being blocked without being able to participate further.

If possible kindly share the page for me just the original post and my interaction with author of post.



Ordinary Members can blind 500 eyes and VIPs can blind 5000 eyes

So SW is for blocking people. 🤣
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Huh, that post belongs to Foxy queen and she blocked you as clearly stated in the post... She's entitled to do so for ANYreason or for NO reason, it's her prerogative and you don't have to agree with it, but that's the way it is.

For instance I am unable to retrieve contents of this post which is quite important to me as it is my intellectual property.

Your comments here once posted anywhere are property of similar worlds as stated in the terms and conditions of the website.
Nanori · F
@AbsolutelyFabulous his
intellectual property
🤧
BillyMack · 46-50, M
@AbsolutelyFabulous I didn’t even think to see that. Bravo for calling him out!

Get em.
@AbsolutelyFabulous that would be an infringement of Intellectual property rights. Kindly show me the terms and conditions where it says posts and content belong to SW ..
val70 · 51-55
@Nanori No property without right!