Debating particular topics isn't being hateful.

@CountScrofula The fact you and others call my views or opinions bullshit says it all.
You and the others cannot accept the fact not everyone can or will agree with you. Unhealthy mindset. If you actually read my posts rather than just reading what you want to, maybe you would understand.

@Lanie78 It's always in the abstract with you people, never about the particular opinions being expressed. I guess I'd probably use that same disingenuous framing if my opinions were as diseased as yours.

@Lanie78
Talking about unhealthy mindset, your obsession with LGBTQ comes to mind.

@Lanie78 let's change this for two seconds.
What if we changed race for transgender.

Would you not think it's racist if people are saying accepting someone's race, their basic human rights and their right to equal and fair treatment shouldn't occur?

Now you know how it sounds.

@basilfawlty89 What? Nowhere have I said that. Seriously you all twist. Out of context totally. I'm all for human rights.

@Lanie78 then why are you arguing post after post against a marginalized community? Again, would you say a child shouldn't learn that people of colour should exist because it's "confusing"?

@Lanie78
We all see your actions aka posts and they speak louder than you claiming to be for human rights. You’re targeting a minority and in a way that’s less than neutral or supportive.

@pillowprincess I'm not targeting anyone..

@Lanie78
The sheer number of posts on this topic created by you tells another story. Acting supportive shows differently than what you’ve produced this far, aka being all for human rights!

@pillowprincess clearly you know me best.

@Lanie78
I don’t know you at all, I can only base my perception of you by your actions. I’ve tried to engage with you on this topic and related stuff that has come up with your own comments for people inside your posts. You’ve deflected to get into talks that would allow me to get an understanding of where you come from. Hence all I can build my opinion on you is your posts and comments…

@CountScrofula FOOL ... you nutjobs throw around insults like it's confetti at a wedding ... 'racist' being one of them {based on NO EVIDENCE of racism whatsoever} ... when i myself ask for evidence of 'racism' they scurry back into their basement like the flea bitten rats that they are ... also, countless times, i read, "you're lying" {again based on NO EVIDENCE} ...

[b]WHEN[/b] will you nutjobs accept that an [b]OPINION[/b] that is different to yours is neither 'racist' or a 'lie'

@BigGuy2 Why do you think opinions can't be racist?

@CountScrofula ... because nobody in their right mind will state it in black and white, that's why ... you nutjobs boil EVERYTHING down to racism, in the hope of embarrassing people into shutting up, it's called CANCEL CULTURE ... that is why they don't provide proof when asked to provide proof of racism, the same with regards to when they say "you're lying" - in 2-3 yrs of requesting evidence of where i've lied, no nutjob has EVER provided proof, as you can't provide proof of something that DOESN'T EXIST {the same with racism} ...

... with regards to "you're lying", i can only assume they mean 'lying' in the sense of, their opponents opinion is opposite to theirs, so in their Mentally Unstable minds, they see it as 'lying'

@BigGuy2 I can barely follow what you're talking about dude. You're just ranting.

@BigGuy2 With all due respect, the fact that you cowards won't "state it in black and white" doesn't make your racism any less real or pernicious. You'd think the fact that people tend to code these things would be [i]more[/i] reason to read between the lines, not [i]less[/i]... right?

@CountScrofula ...

"I can barely follow..."

🤔 ... [b][i]why doesn't that surprise me[/i][/b]

if your pea brain can't follow what i've just said, i suggest you scurry back into the basement, as i've learnt over the years to explain things in the most basic way possible, especially if i'm talking to you's nutjobs

@BigGuy2 You really need to work on how you engage with other people because I imagine you're pretty lonely and wonder why women aren't interested in you. Stop blaming other people for your shortcomings and grow up a little. Get off the internet for a bit and stop watching whatever insane youtube videos are leading you to act like this.

@CountScrofula ...aw, have i hit a sore spot have i ...

... i find it quite scary that i relay whatever i need to relay in the most basic form/format and you STILL can't grasp what i'm saying ...

AND i don't need to work on how i engage with people at all, as you'll find i deal with you nutjobs exactly the same, if you bother to look at the way i speak with people that aren't nutjobs, you'll see i treat them differently 🙄🙄🙄

@BlueVeins FOOL ... what has cowardice got to do with anything, as soon as anyone remotely mentions racism, you nutjobs will contact SW Admin and have them banned or restricted

I'm guessing the below quote from you is this 'unconscious bias' nonsense

[i]"...You'd think the fact that people tend to code these things would be more reason to read between the lines, not less... right?[/i]

@CountScrofula 🤔 ... oh right, so what shortcomings do i have 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

"...women aren't interested ..." - 🤪🤪🤪 so why am i STILL on here after 2-3 yrs ... here's 3 more 🤪🤪🤪

@BigGuy2 You only get banned if you actually do a racism too openly and umambiguously for them to possibly overlook it. And if that's the only reason why you don't outright "state it in black and white", you really shouldn't be surprised that everyone outside of your creepy little death cult holds no such restraint. This is such a self report.

@BlueVeins ... what on earth are you talking about ...

...you can't find racism, so you'll "...read between the lines..." - so that becomes your [b]OPINION[/b] then doesn't it, [b]NOT[/b] fact

@BigGuy2 No fucking shit, sherlock. All subtext is a matter of opinion when it comes down to it, that doesn't mean you shouldn't use it. Racists use subtext to their advantage; it's how they retain the little microgram of plausible deniability they need to avoid freaking out everyone who hates black people but doesn't want to identify with white supremacism. Pro-slavery politicians used a "states' rights" argument back in the day because they didn't want to just stand up in front of the public and say that they think black people belong in chains. They tried to make the literal conversation about [i]process[/i] rather than [i]principle[/i] and took the side on the process debate which just so happens to fuck over black people.

Failing to call out that same kind of strategy being used today is not only naive, it is rhetorically irresponsible to the point of absurdity. We all know the consequences of banning cannabis and giving cops near-unrestrained power in practice, so let's cut the shit and talk about the guiding animus behind all these policy positions.

@BlueVeins FOOL ... all you had to say, or accept, was that i'm right and you're wrong - {5 words, that's all that is needed} you didn't need to do your diatribe did you - how many words ... 50, 60 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️