Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Was it staged? Or was it real?

Surely everyone knows what I’m talking about. This is 2024, expect the unexpected. I’ve seen so many theories and speculations all over social media, I’ve no idea what to think. The world we live in is a scary place. I think I’ll stay under my covers and hide!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
As a former Airborne Infantryman who trained on a M14 as a designated squad sniper (for a while at least), having fired in arctic, jungle and desert conditions using M16s, M4s (AR-15s are the civilan varient), 50 cals, M249s, M240s, shotguns, and some weird stuff handed to me at firing ranges, I know for a fact it is impossible to be reasonably expected to shoot a target the size of a ear from any distance farther than 5 feet away, especially if wind is involved.

Trump owns and has show weapons before (I assume he shot his weapons in NY to qualify for conceal carry). I do not believe anyone with a IQ high enough to pass a gun course will say it is a good idea to have someone target their ear from a couple of hundred meters away. A sniper trains to hit "center mass" at such a target, that means the chest. Not a puny ear. You don't target the ear, it's right next to the brain.

So no, Trump did not set this up. He was already leading in all the swing states with growing momentum. I wouldn't trust even a sniper in the President's 100 (100 top military snipers, and they tend to be women with tits cause their boobs act as stabilizing bipods) with the best gear out there. I've seen the best gear, I had to work as a slave for the Ranger's A Team (I failed to join the rangers and got drafted into slace duties for them as I awaited my new unkt orders) , seen what the most elite snipers we have use. None of that stuff will consistently target just a ear with no margin of failure. It's insane. Army basic training, as some have suggested on this site, does not even remotely give you the skillset to target a head. It's all center mass, and they don't teach you how to adjust for the wind. That's very advanced stuff only a few get high level access to. A good infantryman can hit a target at 1000 yards, and by hit I mean anywhere on the target, enough that the pop up goes down. They get to be snipers. Alot of guys struggle at just 25 yards, close enough to throw a rock at it.

These are professional infantryman. Rifle is their lives. Most people can't shoot. Mlst gun collectors have no idea how to use their weapons. I do, and I don't own a gun. Think it's a mental crutch for their short comings. And a AR-15 is a low caliber crap weapon for hunting deer (I live real close to Butler PA) and you don't buy it for hunting but rather because you seen it on movies and videogames and want to look cool. Alot of police use it merely because they recruit infantry veterans and makes mass training much easier as you're bound to have several experts trained on it day one of recruiting. But it's a crap sniper weapon. It's best for door to door fighting. People say to use it in the jungle like Vietnam but they never had leaces and little vines get stuck all through it when low crawling through a bush with it. Way better stuff to use. The sex would be a woman, her age double this guy's age, and it be a two man team, and nobody skilled enough would agree to do it because it can't be safely done.
@Dignaga Thanks for sharing this, really good insight. And thank you for your service as well!
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@NativePortlander1970 Well this is interesting.
vetguy1991 · 51-55, M
@NativePortlander1970 actually i saw m14s issued in iraq in 2004
@vetguy1991 Horseshit
vetguy1991 · 51-55, M
@NativePortlander1970 whatever dude, i saw what i saw
@NativePortlander1970

That's a actual image of a old stock M14, wood and all, in Iraq (note the HESCO Barriers and the confused Iraqi (probably IPs) standing in the background.

Most of the Army's M14s were found in a bunker that hadn't been open since the Vietnam War up in Alaska when I first arrived at my unit in late 2004, still in the packing grease. I was one of the first to get it. I would of kept it had I not broken my glasses before a qualifying course (couldn't see beyond 700 meters, they can shoot alot farther).

Varients of the M14 are still used in special forces. I will not say what the ranger A Team used, but the varients used in the Army wasn't used by them (ranger battalion gets more more money than tank divisions, they can afford really good stuff for their scout unit).

Look at the picture. Ask yourself why such a elaborate conspiracy to mess with just your mind would exist. Go and google M14 military. Use Bing, Yandex, yahoo, whatever. I can't possibly of rigged them all in the space of a few minutes. The weapon is still in use. New varients are still manufactures. Fiberglass frames are made to replace the wood if you want that (I was seriously thinking of doing that).

My unit also had a M1, a Tommy Gun with the old fashion round magazine, and a bunch of russian weapons listed on the units inventory. No laws exist that prohibits a infantry armory from keeping whatever weapon they want in their armory. Stuff from WW2, Korea, and Vietnam is regularly found in abandoned or forgotten bunkers. They were staffed by draftees using hand written paper records, and entire bunker complexes were forgotten. Heck, the north side of Elmendorf and Fort Richardson (my old base) is uninhabited because the draftees dumped nuclear waste up there, and a old artillary range is somewhere up there too, and nobody remembers where. Why? Draftees are excited to leave andack the professionalism to pass on gokd records to the next guy, if they meet them at all. Shit gets lost all the time. And in Alaska in a bunker, it's cold enough to preserve. I've seen old soviet trucks (some 5 ton varient) driven out of bunkers and put to use. Nobody knew they existed. You drive them till they break down and can't be fixed, then you launch hand held missiles at them on some fjring range up in Fort Greeley. Congress doesn't care. President doesn't. It's government owned, you put them back on the books.

Only time I've seen anyone panic about having gear was stuff already listed on a MTOE. Nobody knows how to read a MTOE except a high ranking supply sargent working in Building 1. Unit XOs pretend like they can, but they can't. If a unit messes up it's books (inventory) the unit's captain freaks out, because that the most important factor in their promotion- not combat loses, the inventory. If they have too much of a listed item, when the inspector general shows up to look at the missing stuff, they might take a interest in why they have more, thinking the unit was stealing from supply or other units. My old units had Ahkios, a military sled filled with sled hammers, ice picks, saws, axes, ten man tent, etc.


I was the lead sled dog for my old unit due to my powerful legs and long endurance before I messed up my knee. You don't use actual dogs when you have privates around. Woof Woof.

All the extra winter tools we had were initially hidden in a space below the loading dock of the supply room, but when the new company commander saw them he freaked out and told us to get rid of them. Everything except a Thor sized 25 pound sledhammer (it became mine, next to my bed, I slept next to CQ and wanted a weapon that could crush someone breaking into the barracks) was taken out by me and a supply sargent out into arctic valley and dumped down a hillside riddled with rusted old military saws.

Everything else gets hidden. I had to get a E3 a new helmet when he lost his in Iraq. Turns out the platoon sargent (E7) had it, but we didn't know that and we were being tested on how we dealt with missing gear. I knew where the base supply kept helmets, and knew they didn't maintain inventory (yet), and so just walked over, went bin to bin and built him a new helmet, all the gear except his little nametag on it.

We showed up for a mission and all the NCOs looked at us jaws dropped. His old helmet came out. I didn't understand the fuss. Apparently nobody ever thought of just going to supply and getting a new one of something lost. I was new as a team leader and didn't even know I was in the wrong. Nobody yelled at us, they kept the new helmet just incase a inspection happened in the future and someone lost a helmet. We had to play hide the potato with it when congress (democrats) ordered the universal inspection of all military gear, but that was just a enlisted conspiracy. Officers hate duplicates of stuff on their personally signed books. The enlisted love it because you can never have enough of something that gets regularly inspected.

Feel free to call bullshit on this, I can go into great detail about unit supply, I was never a armorer but know a bit. I can provide more pics of soldiers in ACUs shooting M14s in Iraq too. I really don't know why you are in this hyler critical mode.

M14 shoots 7.62 rounds. We got plenty in stock. It takes standard gun lubricants. I think I jjst used my M14 cleaning kit on it, don't remember anything special, other than strilling the wood off to clean the barrel was a pain in the ass. Was a very good weapon, better than the M14 and way better than the M4 in terms of accuracy, and it definately had some stolping power. I can link you to some youtube videos discussing the M14 in Iraq and Afghanistan. Soldiers loved it, vietnam era generals and the military industrial complex hated them.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@Dignaga People who think it was a set up don't think that it was the shooter who injured his ear.
@GlitterEater Exactly, where's the blood spray and skin matter that would have followed the "bullet" trail?
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@NativePortlander1970 Dude's analysis is what you'd expect from someone who thinks magic tricks are real.
@GlitterEater You obviously never shot a firearm before.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@NativePortlander1970 You realize that you aren't "dude," right?
@GlitterEater Meaning, what?
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@NativePortlander1970 Meaning I don't understand why you suddenly started acting aggressive.
@GlitterEater Then you need to clarify this reply, it's extremely vague.
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@NativePortlander1970 Do you still think that is about you? Again, you aren't the "dude" in this situation. I'm talking about @Dignaga. Magicians do slight of hand tricks. Dude's analysis assumes that the magician really did pull a coin out of his ear.
@GlitterEater You're not clarifying anything, just spewing nonsense.
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@NativePortlander1970 Why are you upset right now? This legit might be the most confusing interaction I've ever had with someone.
@GlitterEater I'm just asking you what do you mean by that reply, are you agreeing with me or ridiculing my reply to him.
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@NativePortlander1970 I am agreeing with you. Again, THAT COMMENT IS NOT ABOUT YOU. YOU ARE NOT "DUDE."
@GlitterEater It was never about dude or not, I just needed you to clarify magic tricks then slight of hand.
@GlitterEater What interests me is the large number of folks who treat the MSM reporting about the Trump shooting as Absolute Gospel Truth; yet these same folks still claim the 2020 election was "rigged" and Covid was a "hoax."
This comment is hidden. Show Comment