This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultPositive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Here I go again (Sorry - not sorry)

Let’s talk about something we’ve all seen: the way media oversimplifies people and then blames them for not fitting the mold. It’s an old habit, and it runs deeper than most of us realize.

For decades, the public has been fed tidy little narratives that flatten complex human realities into simple stories. And once the story is set, anyone who doesn’t fit it is quietly told they’re the problem.

We’ve seen this pattern in some of the worst places. There was a time when newspapers routinely implied that a woman assaulted on her way home was somehow responsible for what happened to her - because of what she wore, where she walked, or whether she had a drink. Instead of confronting violence, the media offered a simpler, more comfortable story: blame the victim.

The same thing happened with poverty. Rather than examine the economic systems that trap people, headlines framed poverty as a personal failure, a lack of effort or character.

And today, the pattern continues in softer but still damaging ways.

Pop‑psych articles tell readers that if they don’t have three specific habits, they lack self‑discipline or worthiness, or if they don't wear this or use this makeup, they are somehow less - as if the entire human experience can be reduced to a checklist, hair color, new trend, etc.

These narratives don’t help people. They shrink them. They teach readers to measure themselves against someone else’s template and to feel inadequate when they don’t match it.

They encourage self‑blame instead of self‑understanding. And they distract us from the deeper truths about how people grow, struggle, and make meaning in their lives.

So be careful, don’t fall into the trap. When a headline tries to tell you who you should be, remember that it’s selling readership count, not truth.

You’re NOT supposed to fit a prefab mold, and you’re NOT FAILING when you don’t.

If even one person reads this and realizes they were never the problem to begin with, then saying it out loud is worth the effort.
Top | New | Old
ArishMell · 70-79, M
A very good question.

I'm not sure if the Press is entirely to blame although it does often reduce matters, and people, to binaries and stereotypes. Politicians can be as bad.

Sometimes this appears to be for attacking their own opponents-in-opinion, by creating imaginary classes with titles like "the typical Daily Blether/i] reader".

Or to push an opinion by pretending to be Statisticians: "The average [i]Sunday Rhubarb
reader"; "it is common knowledge that...", as if the writer has asked everyone. Which is impossible of course; but might be based on balances of opinions in letters to newspapers and of course social-media; the latter often, unfortunately, anti-social-media.

Or they imagine that because they do something in a certain way, everyone does. ("Now we all..." do this, listen to that, etc.)


The "now we [can] all work at home" notion is a specific example.

It arose from office-based companies and self-employed columnists trying to keep the work going during the Covid lock-downs, but became enlarged to a curious assumption that because these relatively a few could do that, "we all" can. The original, official advice was, "work at home if you can", and that second clause is vital.

Sitting behind a computer in the spare bedroom does not deliver goods, build houses, transplant livers, make foods, print newspapers, etc. One might wonder just how much keeping the cat rather than colleague company, does achieve anything useful!

The resulting "now we [can / will] all work at home" falsehood was promoted to stereotype by people whose work genuinely is almost entirely keyboard-based, neglecting the "if you can" qualifier and not comprehending that their own lives and livelihoods rely on so many others who physically can not work like that.

It occurred to me that some of those writers might think themselves very metropolitan and cosmopolitan but really have very narrow lives, with little contact even socially with people from outside their own little worlds.


I think the general attitude has always been there though. It is lazy, and it appeals to those who believe in the shallow herd mentality behind gratuitous fashions.

Including the modern fad for classifying people by colloloqialisms like "millenial" and "jenzed" - or "jenzee" in the USA. The implication is that the people so-labelled are clones having specific likes and dislikes, bvehaviour, etc. defined by... by what exactly? By whom?.

We encounter it far more then in the past because there are far more ways to spread the message far more widely. So I would not blame the Press, politicians or pundits entirely. I think they reflect social attitudes at large but tend to concentrate those attitudes and help spread them.
Northwest · M
A specific example of the current situation might help get the conversation started.
Ontheroad · M
@Northwest it was an article I was reading WRITTEN by some pop-psy writer saying that his three specific traits (included in the article) means you are self-disciplined. The way the article was written suggested this was the key - that these three things were it and only these three things. Pure garbage. Many, many different combination of traits can mean you are self-disciplined.
PatientlyWaiting25 · 46-50, F
That sounds like it should be a pop- psych article lol 😂
When a headline tries to tell you who you should be, remember that it’s selling readership count, not truth.

You’re NOT supposed to fit a prefab mold, and you’re NOT FAILING when you don’t.

This is happening much worse because of social media. Our generation believes everything they read and watch online.

“Trial by social media” has become a norm. We just, we talk about, we share news/info that we don’t even care to validate.

That prefab mode you’re talking about is shaped by the nature of the society we lived in.
Ontheroad · M
@CookieCrumbs you are spot-on there, and worse, people see it and repeat it and their targets (known and unknown) suffer the consequences.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Ontheroad · M
@CookieCrumbs it all feels on the surface like shallow nonsense, but it does exactly what you noted. Sad, so sad and so damaging to our society.
candycane · 36-40, F
im still a candy cane sticky but sweet

Turtlepower · 36-40, M
@candycane go on 😏
everytime someone complains about the media (typically a rightwinger but not always), I always have to scratch my head, because I can never relate to the experience they are insisting is happening

I cannot possibly blame the media for my own thoughts

 
Post Comment