This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultRandom
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Freedom of Speech

The concept is very much under scrutiny right now. If there are consequences for speech then does freedom of speech exist?

I would argue that freedom of speech only applies to criminal law, not civil or employment law. You should be protected from criminal prosecution but not from civil or employment action. If you say something controversial then you don't go to jail, that's freedom of speech. If you say something controversial and get fired from your job, that's a business protecting its brand. If you have issue with the fairness of your dismissal then you handle that via employment tribunal.

If you say something controversial and get sued then that would fall under defamation, namely slander or libel. You should not have the freedom to lie where it is to the detriment of others.

When people campaign to get you fired for saying controversial things, that's not an attack on your freedom of speech. That's not the state imposing or enforcing a law which stifles your freedom.

In essence, freedom of speech is a contract between you and the state, not you and every other individual or business.

That's my take on it 🤔
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Pretzel · 70-79, M
And it should have been called "freer speech" not freedom speech

The colonists were freer to talk about their government than they were under the rule of the king.

But there are limits.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Pretzel That will change now that americans have a king
Pretzel · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 wish I could argue against that point.
Sharon · F
@newjaninev2 King? I thought they had a facist dictator.