What’s your take on quantum.

@nobodyishome

Universe isn't self-similar across all scales. How Quantum mechanics governs smallest scales (Planck length for instance) is very differently from how gravity dominates large scales (Cosmic Horizon), whereas true mathematical fractals are infinite in both directions.

Fractals can be good models for understanding certain cosmic structures, they're more of an approximation than a fundamental property due to the Universe's randomness and irregularities

@Northwest Why do you think the Universe is randomness?

@nobodyishome
Because the Big Bang was not a perfectly symmetrical event.

@Northwest I disagree physics laws are a constant. And while quantum from our perspective seems random it’s only because it’s new and we haven’t found patterns yet. We consider superposition random as a particle can exist in diff states or entanglement where they are connected with others or the slit experiment can be considered random to us but that’s only because they are so new that we don’t have patterns there yet to define them. But if math governs all that’s a constant. And while to us they seem random to a higher devinity they most certainly aren’t and he could predict and control anything. So while we see the universe as random it is not it’s controlled by Devine forces so I believe them to have consistency we can’t fathom.

@userfawkes1105 hey, that's an awesome explanation. Thanks. I studied Nanotechnology in my Masters, but I haven't that much understanding of the quantum world as of yet.

@Northwest I have a theory about the Big Bang, but you will call me crayy if I told you. So I will just keep the secrets Allah tells me all the time to myself 😊

@nobodyishome nice are you working within the space now? Would be cool to learn that to work on super capacitors and energy storage. Or nano filters for water desalination. Bet you get into way cool stuff.

@userfawkes1105 yea, I built selective emitters for thermophotovoltaic energy conversion out of multilayer thin films using nanotechnology.

@userfawkes1105


The laws of Physics, currently, do not change over time or across different regions of the universe. However, we're starting to look into the possibility variations of fundamental constants under extreme conditions. The birth of the universe, and early universe would quality as extreme. Same applies when dealing with cosmic scales.


Hmm, the slit experiment is nearly 225 years old. This is not even a blip on the universal scale, but when that experiment was conducted Physics was in its relative embryonic stage. So, it's not exactly new.

PS: I did not think we're discussing divinity.

@nobodyishome


Nanotechnology could be considered a quantum science. At the extreme nanoscale scale, quantum phenomena become unavoidable.

As far as I know, today's photovoltaic applications use classical physics, chemistry, materials science, biology and engineering, not quantum science.

@nobodyishome
I wouldn't be able to participate in that conversation. I don't delve into religion.

@Northwest the current laws could just be a subset of bigger undiscovered laws though so while they don’t change completely as they associate with one another you could say they become a new one all together. Like u said concepts within extreme cases could hold patters. The fact that the slit experiment is like you said no longer relevant proves how things have changed in the past on to what we have now. I also don’t think u need to believe in a divinity to find yourself finding proof of one. But if you don’t want lo put a label on it I respect that. All is revealed in its due time.

@Northwest I wasn't talkin about religion. I was talking about Allah telling me things. How is that religion, again?

@nobodyishome
My bad. I stand corrected. It's not about religion, but you have conversation with "Allah" 😭

@Northwest Yes, I do. I'm His best friend. The best out there. What's funny