We can observe evolution happening before our eyes.

That's why creationists had to start calling it "micro evolution" and acknowledge that it happens.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NArlXzSFt2Y]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

Evolution within a species or short period of time only [b]contribute[/b] to macroevolution. Without microevolution, macroevolution doesn't exist. The two do have differences because an entire group higher than species does not change just because one species may undergo microevolution

Pikachu

@SW-User

If you like. But it't not really a necessary distinction. It's all just evolution.

SW-User

@Pikachu in reality, the classifications are like a house. Sure you got a pillar and some beams and walls but it's all evolution in the end

I see no reason to call it something different. Judt wanted to clarify why

Pikachu

@SW-User

Yeah i have no problem with that. My only problem with the term "mircorevolution" is that creationists use it as a tool to deny that evolution is happening at all.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@SW-User There’s neither ‘micro-evolution’ nor ‘macro-evolution’.

To acknowledge one and to deny the other is like saying that you accept seconds, but deny minutes, and that neither can lead to hours.

There’s just time

There’s just evolution