BlueVeins · 22-25
Yeah it's permissable; in fact, it's a moral obligation. Genetic alterations will inevitably start out expensive, but as technology improves (as it always does), its cost will decline, putting poor families in a better position. Even if the cost magically didn't decrease and it always remained expensive, that wouldn't directly hurt poor people, and would strengthen the economy. Strengthening the economy benefits everyone, poor people included.
View 1 more replies »
SomeAreBoojums · 51-55, M
@BlueVeins I strongly disagree that the wealthy will allow this privilege become available to "the masses." Automotive technology has increased dramatically in the last three decades, yet I still see more working-class people riding the bus than driving a Lexus.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@SomeAreBoojums Lexuses (awkward pluralization lol) are expensive largely because part of their appeal is the fact that only rich fucks can buy them. It's unlikely that a product as widely-needed as genetic editing would need such an appeal because it already has the appeal of preventing your kids from dying of muscular dystrophy.
Really, the automobile industry is the perfect example of a type of product that got progressively cheaper as time went on. Right now, you can go out and buy a cheap sedan for about US$14,000. Back in 1886, a much, much slower, more dangerous, uglier, and less reliable version of the same vehicle would've cost you equivalent of $24,500.
Really, the automobile industry is the perfect example of a type of product that got progressively cheaper as time went on. Right now, you can go out and buy a cheap sedan for about US$14,000. Back in 1886, a much, much slower, more dangerous, uglier, and less reliable version of the same vehicle would've cost you equivalent of $24,500.

SW-User
It doesn't really matter if it's moral or not, the wealthy will simply buy the laws to make it permitted.
xixgun · M
I think once again people are ignoring the messages given to us by literature and film.
Case in point: Frankenstein and Jurassic Park. “Just because you can do something doesn’t mean that you should”
Case in point: Frankenstein and Jurassic Park. “Just because you can do something doesn’t mean that you should”
BeefySenpie · M
Not really a fan...as much as it can be used for good, I think there is an odd sort of beauty in imperfection and leaving things to biological chance
BlueVeins · 22-25
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
It will happen, like it or not. And if people cant get it in America or Europe, then they will go to China or India , where the best researchers will go to keep working.
SomeAreBoojums · 51-55, M
It inevitably will result in advantages for the wealthy. Regardless of the morality of it, the technology will be used (by those who can afford it)

SW-User
I'm just waiting for them to make a mistake and it wipes us all out
Pfuzylogic · M
I think that it is smart if it avoids genetic diseases.
I believe that there will be gifted and incredibly intelligent babies born that aren’t gene edited just like now.
I believe that there will be gifted and incredibly intelligent babies born that aren’t gene edited just like now.
I am thinking more along the lines of a genetic catastrophe like causing a second or third generation to be born sterile.
PhoenixPhail · M
I don't think it's prudent to use this technology. Just because we can, doesn't mean we should.
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
I think they covered this in an anime. It didn't end well.
eMortal · M
It's no different than choosing a husband or wife based on a hope that they will give you good looking and healthy offsprings. We do it everyday.
The poor marry the ugly.
What your talking about is just a modernized version of the same issue.
The poor marry the ugly.
What your talking about is just a modernized version of the same issue.