This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
The presence or absence of The negative blood in monkeys and apes is inconsequential to evolution. We do not descend from apes, we share a common ancestor. The mutation and spread of Rh negative blood may have occurred after the species split. In that event we would not expect to see it in apes.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@SW-User it's more ignorant than stupid. There are people out there trying to purposefully misinform about evolution because it threatens their religious beliefs. Big money and big emotion both in religion.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Alabamiangods · 46-50, F
@SW-User Alabamians and Tennesseans do not share a common ancestor.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SomeMichGuy · M
@SW-User This is an internecine struggle between two groups of very closely related people. It reminds me of, e.g., the nonsense in the former Yugoslavia after the death of Tito/fall of Communism: ppl without much experience of a wider world have a "world" with a tiny radius, and tend to hang onto old wrongs, etc., real or imagined.
The "other"-ing of neighbors is typical, senseless, etc.
But trying to fight it...*shrug* A fool & his notions are almost never parted.
The "other"-ing of neighbors is typical, senseless, etc.
But trying to fight it...*shrug* A fool & his notions are almost never parted.