Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The New Science™ compared to science as it always was up to 2020

[b]The new Science™ [/b] on cultural issues and pandemic interventions is enshrined in legislation and diktats of the administrative state, and enforced by the state as well as through mechanisms of social control and psychological nudging. All dissent is ruthlessly suppressed and dissenting voices are silenced and cancelled.

[b]Science as an age-old concept[/b]

Yet, science is a work in progress, not an encyclopedia of facts.

Although the long arc of science bends towards truth, progress is neither linear nor irreversible. Scientists have a responsibility to subject the existing consensus to searching scrutiny in line with empirical observations. They must have the corresponding right to challenge the prevailing dominant narratives. Diversity viewpoints on contested elements of knowledge and rejection of attempts to suppress dissenting voices provide necessary safeguards against reverses of knowledge.

If the infrastructure of the surveillance state and collusion of the Censorship-Industrial Complex had been available to authorities and gatekeepers of public morals and knowledge in previous eras, we would all still be flat-earthers!

[i]For all source-addicts:

Source: a writer

Suggestion to our dear source-addicted friends: Try evaluating the ideas presented, using your own intelligence. Don't run to your protecting "fact-checkers." Be an adult! Work it out for yourself![/i]
ArishMell · 70-79, M
We saw a real-life version of your "Censorship-Industrial Complex " hypothesis for several hundred years in much of Europe. Only the "industry" concerned was the anti-science, God-bothering one, in the shape of the Church of Rome and its overweening attachment to Biblical literalism and the pagan Classical Greek's geocentric universe model.

Let that be a warning - but also remember that on the whole, apart from horrors like nuclear weapons that still threaten us, Science has benefited mankind and seeks to expand Knowledge, not "censor" anyone.

Besides, if it were not for science and industry you not be able to campaign so easily but vainly against governments, international organisations and co-operation, public health, telecommunications and any opinions or facts that don't fit your ideas.

Nor to campaign against anyone who simply wants to read your sources of information directly, not only the third-party "fact-checkers" you sneer at. To continue the historical parallel, just as the Mediaeval Church of Rome so feared and despised any but the trusted few reading its own "source material" for themselves, it forbade translating the Bible into modern, national languages.

.....

Oh, and there are Flat-Earth Geocentrists and Biblical Literalists abroad even now; Yeah, even unto The Year of Our Lord 2023, and verily the irony of using the Internet to disseminate their beliefs is lost on them - and they really do think only they are right and everyone else is mistaken, misled or a liar. :-)
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 No genuine scientist believes Science has all the answers. If they did it would barely have progressed since the Age of Enlightenment.

More likely that infallibility belief is the one held by people who do not understand science and scientific method - so that is most politicians, journalists, many business people and even today, a few religious cultists.

It's that, [i]not [/i]Science itself, that led to much of the popular 20C belief that we can solve all of the world's problems if we only "tame" or "harness" Nature by lots and lots of Science and Engineering.

No - Science and Engineering can and certainly has benefitted us, and still will do so; but it needs proper understanding and application of them by policy-makers and commerce to have any chance of solving everything even if that is possible.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@ArishMell and there is a big rock candy mountain.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 Is there? Oh, and here's me thinking that was the subject of a silly song for patronising children...

Just admit - you despise science yet drive about in a big van and use the Internet.....
Fairydust · F
[image deleted]
Science these days is bought and paid for by criminal billionaires.

 
Post Comment