Darwin and the cell

We now know that the cell is a very complex organ. It is a cell that contains a mitochondrial cell and organelles that are full of chemical and electrical interactions way more complex than Darwin or any scientists ever knew at that time. It makes me wonder if Darwin had known how complex the cell really was and not just a blob of plasma if it would have effected his theory.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

gol979 · 41-45, M

Darwin......an avowed believer in eugenics. The parasite class loved the science behind "plasma" and genetics. The so called elites were in positions of power because of their plasma/genes and the unclean/undesirables were to be sterilised, thrown in asylums because their "inate plasma" was defunct.........so, i dont think his theory would have changed, it suited the parasite class

Axeroberts · 56-60, M

@gol979 So it wasn't based on the science of the day?

gol979 · 41-45, M

@Axeroberts yes it was but the science suited powerful people/institutions. Also, it hasnt changed since we have known that "plasma" is utter hogwash

Axeroberts · 56-60, M

@gol979 and now it's 150 years out of date based on information that isn't true

gol979 · 41-45, M

@Axeroberts yep. Have you seen that clip of george-bernard shaw advocating for a death panel (something bill gates is annoyed you cant talk about openly these days) for people that were deemed to have faulty plasma?

Axeroberts · 56-60, M

@gol979 no